International variations in hip fracture probabilities: Implications for risk assessment

被引:414
作者
Kanis, JA
Johnell, O
De Laet, C
Jonsson, B
Oden, A
Ogelsby, AK
机构
[1] Univ Sheffield, Sch Med, WHO Collaborating Ctr, Ctr Metab Bone Dis, Sheffield S10 2RX, S Yorkshire, England
[2] Malmo Gen Hosp, Dept Orthoped, S-21401 Malmo, Sweden
[3] Inst Med Technol Assessment, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[4] Stockholm Sch Econ, Dept Econ, S-11383 Stockholm, Sweden
[5] Eli Lilly & Co, Lilly Corp Ctr, Indianapolis, IN 46285 USA
关键词
hip fracture risk; 10-year probability; lifetime risk; intervention threshold;
D O I
10.1359/jbmr.2002.17.7.1237
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
It is recommended that intervention thresholds should be based on absolute fracture risk, but there is a large variation in hip fracture incidence from different regions of the world. The aim of this study was to examine heterogeneity of hip fracture probability in different regions from recent estimates of hip fracture incidence and mortality to adjust intervention thresholds. Ten-year probabilities of hip fracture were computed in men and women at 10-year intervals from the age of 50 years and lifetime risks at the age of 50 years from the hazard functions of hip fracture and death. Lifetime risk at the age of 50 years varied from 1% in women from Turkey to 28.5% in women from Sweden. High lifetime risks in women were associated with high lifetime risks in men (r = 0.83). There also were significant correlations of 10-year risk at any age between men and women. Ten-year probability was standardized to that of men and women from Sweden (set at 1.0). There was a 15-fold range in 10-year probability from 1.24 in Norway to 0.08 in Chile. Countries were categorized by 10-year probabilities comprising very high risk (Norway, Iceland, Sweden, Denmark, and the United States), high risk (China [Taiwan {TW}], Germany, Switzerland, Finland, Greece, Canada, The Netherlands, Hungary, Singapore, Italy, United Kingdom, Kuwait, Australia, and Portugal), medium risk (China [Hong Kong {HK}], France, Japan, Spain, Argentina, and China), and low risk (Turkey, Korea, Venezuela, and Chile). The categorization of hip fracture probabilities can be used to adjust intervention thresholds based on age, sex, and relative risk from a reference population such as Sweden.
引用
收藏
页码:1237 / 1244
页数:8
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1995, Osteoporosis: Etiology, Diagnosis, and Management
[2]   International comparison of hip fracture rates in 1988-89 [J].
Bacon, WE ;
Maggi, S ;
Looker, A ;
Harris, T ;
Nair, CR ;
Giaconi, J ;
Honkanen, R ;
Ho, SC ;
Peffers, KA ;
Torring, O ;
Gass, R ;
Gonzalez, N .
OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 1996, 6 (01) :69-75
[3]   EPIDEMIOLOGY OF HIP-FRACTURES IN AN URBAN-POPULATION OF CENTRAL ARGENTINA [J].
BAGUR, A ;
MAUTALEN, C ;
RUBIN, Z .
OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 1994, 4 (06) :332-335
[4]  
BAUDOIN C, 1993, OSTEOPOROSIS INT, V3, P43, DOI 10.1007/BF01623176
[5]   A population-based study of fracture incidence in Southern Tasmania: Lifetime fracture risk and evidence for geographic variations within the same country [J].
Cooley, H ;
Jones, G .
OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2001, 12 (02) :124-130
[6]  
DELAET C, 1996, 9644 IMTA
[7]   EPIDEMIOLOGY OF FRACTURES OF THE PROXIMAL FEMUR ASSOCIATED WITH OSTEOPOROSIS IN BARCELONA, SPAIN [J].
DIEZ, A ;
PUIG, J ;
MARTINEZ, MT ;
DIEZ, JL ;
AUBIA, J ;
VIVANCOS, J .
CALCIFIED TISSUE INTERNATIONAL, 1989, 44 (06) :382-386
[8]   THE VARIABLE INCIDENCE OF HIP FRACTURE IN SOUTHERN EUROPE - THE MEDOS STUDY [J].
ELFFORS, I ;
ALLANDER, E ;
KANIS, JA ;
GULLBERG, B ;
JOHNELL, O ;
DEQUEKER, J ;
DILSEN, G ;
GENNARI, C ;
VAZ, AAL ;
LYRITIS, G ;
MAZZUOLI, GF ;
MIRAVET, L ;
PASSERI, M ;
CANO, RP ;
RAPADO, A ;
RIBOT, C .
OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 1994, 4 (05) :253-263
[9]  
*EUR COMM, 1998, REP OST EUR COMM
[10]   SECULAR INCREASE AND GEOGRAPHICAL DIFFERENCES IN HIP FRACTURE INCIDENCE IN NORWAY [J].
FALCH, JA ;
KAASTAD, TS ;
BOHLER, G ;
ESPELAND, J ;
SUNDSVOLD, OJ .
BONE, 1993, 14 (04) :643-645