Effect of the USPSTF Grade D Recommendation against Screening for Prostate Cancer on Incident Prostate Cancer Diagnoses in the United States

被引:107
作者
Barocas, Daniel A. [2 ]
Mallin, Katherine [3 ]
Graves, Amy J. [2 ]
Penson, David F. [2 ]
Palis, Bryan [3 ]
Winchester, David P. [3 ]
Chang, Sam S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Vanderbilt Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Urol Surg, Nashville, TN 37232 USA
[2] Vanderbilt Univ, Med Ctr, Ctr Surg Qual & Outcomes Res, Nashville, TN 37232 USA
[3] Amer Coll Surg, Natl Canc Data Base, Chicago, IL USA
关键词
prostatic neoplasms; mass screening; prostate-specific antigen; guideline; diagnosis; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; RADIATION-THERAPY; MORTALITY; CARE; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.juro.2015.06.075
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
100201 [内科学]; 100221 [泌尿外科学];
摘要
Purpose: In October 2011 the USPSTF (U.S. Preventive Services Task Force) issued a draft guideline discouraging prostate specific antigen based screening for prostate cancer (grade D recommendation). We evaluated the effect of the USPSTF guideline on the number and distribution of new prostate cancer diagnoses in the United States. Materials and Methods: We identified incident cancers diagnosed between January 2010 and December 2012 in NCDB (National Cancer Database). We performed an interrupted time series to evaluate the trend of new prostate cancers diagnosed each month before and after the draft guideline with colon cancer as a comparator. Results: Incident monthly prostate cancer diagnoses decreased by 1,363 cases (12.2%, p <0.01) in the month after the USPSTF draft guideline and continued to decrease by 164 cases per month relative to baseline (-1.8%, p <0.01). In contrast monthly colon cancer diagnoses remained stable. Diagnoses of low, intermediate and high risk prostate cancers decreased significantly but new diagnoses of nonlocalized disease did not change. Subgroups of age, comorbidity, race, income and insurance showed comparable decreases in incident prostate cancer following the draft guideline. Conclusions: There was a 28% decrease in incident diagnoses of prostate cancer in the year after the USPSTF draft recommendation against prostate specific antigen screening. This study helps quantify the potential benefits (reduced harms of over diagnosis and overtreatment of low risk disease and disease found in elderly men) and potential harms (missed opportunities to diagnose important cancers in men who may benefit from treatment) of this guideline.
引用
收藏
页码:1587 / 1593
页数:7
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]
20-year outcomes following conservative management of clinically localized prostate cancer [J].
Albertsen, PC ;
Hanley, JA ;
Fine, J .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2005, 293 (17) :2095-2101
[2]
Mortality Results from a Randomized Prostate-Cancer Screening Trial [J].
Andriole, Gerald L. ;
Grubb, Robert L., III ;
Buys, Saundra S. ;
Chia, David ;
Church, Timothy R. ;
Fouad, Mona N. ;
Gelmann, Edward P. ;
Kvale, Paul A. ;
Reding, Douglas J. ;
Weissfeld, Joel L. ;
Yokochi, Lance A. ;
Crawford, E. David ;
O'Brien, Barbara ;
Clapp, Jonathan D. ;
Rathmell, Joshua M. ;
Riley, Thomas L. ;
Hayes, Richard B. ;
Kramer, Barnett S. ;
Izmirlian, Grant ;
Miller, Anthony B. ;
Pinsky, Paul F. ;
Prorok, Philip C. ;
Gohagan, John K. ;
Berg, Christine D. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2009, 360 (13) :1310-1319
[3]
[Anonymous], PROSTATESPECIFIC ANT
[4]
The Impact of Recent Screening Recommendations on Prostate Cancer Screening in a Large Health Care System [J].
Aslani, Afshin ;
Minnillo, Brian J. ;
Johnson, Ben ;
Cherullo, Edward E. ;
Ponsky, Lee E. ;
Abouassaly, Robert .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 191 (06) :1737-1742
[5]
Racial variation in the pattern and quality of care for prostate cancer in the USA: mind the gap [J].
Barocas, Daniel A. ;
Penson, David F. .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2010, 106 (03) :322-328
[6]
Recommendations on screening for prostate cancer with the prostate-specific antigen test [J].
Bell, Neil ;
Gorber, Sarah Connor ;
Shane, Amanda ;
Joffres, Michel ;
Singh, Harminder ;
Dickinson, James ;
Shaw, Elizabeth ;
Dunfield, Lesley ;
Tonelli, Marcello .
CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2014, 186 (16) :1225-1234
[7]
Impact of the US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendations against Prostate Specific Antigen Screening on Prostate Biopsy and Cancer Detection Rates [J].
Bhindi, Bimal ;
Mamdani, Muhammad ;
Kulkarni, Girish S. ;
Finelli, Antonio ;
Hamilton, Robert J. ;
Trachtenberg, John ;
Zlotta, Alexandre R. ;
Evans, Andrew ;
van der Kwast, Theodorus H. ;
Toi, Ants ;
Fleshner, Neil E. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 193 (05) :1519-1524
[8]
The National Cancer Data Base: A powerful initiative to improve cancer care in the United States [J].
Bilimoria, Karl Y. ;
Stewart, Andrew K. ;
Winchester, David P. ;
Ko, Clifford Y. .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2008, 15 (03) :683-690
[9]
Radical Prostatectomy or Watchful Waiting in Early Prostate Cancer [J].
Bill-Axelson, Anna ;
Holmberg, Lars ;
Garmo, Hans ;
Rider, Jennifer R. ;
Taari, Kimmo ;
Busch, Christer ;
Nordling, Stig ;
Haggman, Michael ;
Andersson, Swen-Olof ;
Spangberg, Anders ;
Andren, Ove ;
Palmgren, Juni ;
Steineck, Gunnar ;
Adami, Hans-Olov ;
Johansson, Jan-Erik .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2014, 370 (10) :932-942
[10]
Early Detection of Prostate Cancer: AUA Guideline [J].
Carter, H. Ballentine ;
Albertsen, Peter C. ;
Barry, Michael J. ;
Etzioni, Ruth ;
Freedland, Stephen J. ;
Greene, Kirsten Lynn ;
Holmberg, Lars ;
Kantoff, Philip ;
Konety, Badrinath R. ;
Murad, Mohammad Hassan ;
Penson, David F. ;
Zietman, Anthony L. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 190 (02) :419-426