ON SURROGATE LOSS FUNCTIONS AND f-DIVERGENCES

被引:63
作者
Nguyen, XuanLong [1 ,2 ]
Wainwright, Martin J. [3 ,4 ]
Jordan, Michael I. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Dept Stat Sci, Durham, NC 27708 USA
[2] SAMSI, Durham, NC 27709 USA
[3] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Stat, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[4] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Elect Engn & Comp Sci, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Binary classification; discriminant analysis; surrogate losses; f-divergences; Ali-Silvey divergences; quantizer design; nonparametric decentralized detection; statistical machine learning; Bayes consistency; DECENTRALIZED DETECTION; DISTANCE MEASURES; CONSISTENCY; CLASSIFICATION; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1214/08-AOS595
中图分类号
O21 [概率论与数理统计]; C8 [统计学];
学科分类号
020208 ; 070103 ; 0714 ;
摘要
The goal of binary classification is to estimate a discriminant function gamma from observations of covariate vectors and corresponding binary labels. We consider an elaboration of this problem in which the covariates are not available directly but are transformed by a dimensionality-reducing quantizer Q. We present conditions on loss functions such that empirical risk minimization yields Bayes consistency when both the discriminant function and the quantizer are estimated. These conditions are stated in terms of a general correspondence between loss functions and a class of functionals known as Ali-Silvey or f-divergence functionals. Whereas this correspondence was established by Blackwell [Proc. 2nd Berkeley Symp. Probab. Statist. 1 (1951) 93-102. Univ. California Press, Berkeley] for the 0-1 loss, we extend the correspondence to the broader class of surrogate loss functions that play a key role in the general theory of Bayes consistency for binary classification. Our result makes it possible to pick out the (strict) subset of surrogate loss functions that yield Bayes consistency for joint estimation of the discriminant function and the quantizer.
引用
收藏
页码:876 / 904
页数:29
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] ALI SM, 1966, J ROY STAT SOC B, V28, P131
  • [2] Convexity, classification, and risk bounds
    Bartlett, PL
    Jordan, MI
    McAuliffe, JD
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 2006, 101 (473) : 138 - 156
  • [3] EQUIVALENT COMPARISONS OF EXPERIMENTS
    BLACKWELL, D
    [J]. ANNALS OF MATHEMATICAL STATISTICS, 1953, 24 (02): : 265 - 272
  • [4] BLACKWELL D, 1951, P 2 BERK S PROB STAT, V1, P93
  • [5] ON THE DESIGN AND COMPARISON OF CERTAIN DICHOTOMOUS EXPERIMENTS
    BRADT, RN
    KARLIN, S
    [J]. ANNALS OF MATHEMATICAL STATISTICS, 1956, 27 (02): : 390 - 409
  • [6] CORTES C, 1995, MACH LEARN, V20, P273, DOI 10.1023/A:1022627411411
  • [7] Csiszar Imre., 1967, Studia Sci. Math. Hungar, V2, P229
  • [8] Hiriart-Urruty J.-B., 2001, Fundamentals of convex analysis
  • [9] Jiang WX, 2004, ANN STAT, V32, P13
  • [10] DIVERGENCE AND BHATTACHARYYA DISTANCE MEASURES IN SIGNAL SELECTION
    KAILATH, T
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY, 1967, CO15 (01): : 52 - &