Diagnostic thresholds for diabetes: The association of retinopathy and albuminuria with glycaemia

被引:65
作者
Tapp, R. J. [1 ]
Zirnmet, P. Z.
Harper, C. A.
de Courten, M. P.
McCarty, D. J.
Balkau, B.
Taylor, H. R.
Welborn, T. A.
Shaw, J. E.
机构
[1] Monash Univ, Dept Epidemiol & Prevent Med, Cent & Eastern Clin Sch, Alfred Hosp, Prahran, Vic 3004, Australia
[2] Int Diabet Inst, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] Ctr Eye Res Australia, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[4] Marshfield Clin Res Fdn, Marshfield, WI USA
[5] Univ Paris 11, INSERM U258, IFR69, Villejuif, France
[6] Univ Western Australia, Dept Med, Nedlands, WA 6009, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
diabetes mellitus; diabetic retinopathy; diagnostic criteria; epidemiology;
D O I
10.1016/j.diabres.2006.02.008
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 [临床医学]; 100201 [内科学];
摘要
Aim: We examined the association of fasting plasma glucose (FPG), 2-h plasma glucose (2hPG) and HbA1c with retinopathy and microalbuminuria using both deciles of glycaemia and change point models, to validate current diagnostic criteria for diabetes and to identify therapeutic thresholds for glycaemic control. Methods: The Australian Diabetes Obesity and Lifestyle study (AusDiab), conducted in 1999-2000, included adults aged >= 25 years from 42 randomly selected areas of Australia. Retinopathy and albuminuria were assessed in participants identified as having diabetes (based on self report and oral glucose tolerance test), impaired fasting glucose, impaired glucose tolerance and in a random sample with normal glucose tolerance. Data were available for 2182 participants with retinal photographs and 2389 with urinary albumin/creatinine results. Results: The prevalence of retinopathy in the first 8 deciles of FPG and HbA1c, and the first 9 deciles of 2hPG were 7.2, 6.6, a-ad 6.3%, respectively and showed no variation with increasing glucose or HbA1c. Above these levels, the prevalence rose markedly to 18.6% in the top 2 deciles of FPG, 21.3% in the top 2 deciles of HbA1c and 10.9% in the top decile of 2hPG. The thresholds for increasing prevalence of retinopathy were 7.1 mmol/l for FPG, 6.1% for HbA1c and 13.1 mmol/l for 2hPG. The prevalence of microalbuminuria rose gradually across deciles of each glycaemic measure. Thresholds were less clear than for retinopathy, but were seen at a FPG of 7.2 mmol/l and HbAlc of 6.1%, with no evidence of a threshold effect for 2hPG. Conclusions: The prevalence of retinopathy rose dramatically in the highest deciles of each glycaemic measure, while for microalbuminuria the increase of prevalence was more gradual. The FPG values corresponded well with the WHO diagnostic cutpoint for diabetes, however the 2hPG value did not. HbAlc thresholds were similar for both retinopathy and microalbuminuria and compared well to values shown in other studies. These results support current targets for FPG and HbAlc in preventing microvascular complications. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:315 / 321
页数:7
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]
Alberti KGMM, 1998, DIABETIC MED, V15, P539, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9136(199807)15:7<539::AID-DIA668>3.0.CO
[2]
2-S
[3]
ALDINGTON SJ, 1995, DIABETOLOGIA, V38, P437, DOI 10.1007/BF00410281
[4]
Bennett P H, 1976, Recent Prog Horm Res, V32, P333
[5]
EXTRAORDINARY PREVALENCE OF NON-INSULIN-DEPENDENT DIABETES-MELLITUS AND BIMODAL PLASMA-GLUCOSE DISTRIBUTION IN THE WANIGELA PEOPLE OF PAPUA-NEW-GUINEA [J].
DOWSE, GK ;
SPARK, RA ;
MAVO, B ;
HODGE, AM ;
ERASMUS, RT ;
GWALIMU, M ;
KNIGHT, LT ;
KOKI, G ;
ZIMMET, PZ .
MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 1994, 160 (12) :767-774
[6]
The Australian Diabetes, Obesity and Lifestyle Study (AusDiab) - methods and response rates [J].
Dunstan, DW ;
Zimmet, PZ ;
Welborn, TA ;
Cameron, AJ ;
Shaw, J ;
de Courten, M ;
Jolley, D ;
McCarty, DJ .
DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2002, 57 (02) :119-129
[7]
Comparison of fasting and 2-hour glucose and HbA(1c) levels for diagnosing diabetes - Diagnostic criteria and performance revisited [J].
Engelgau, MM ;
Thompson, TJ ;
Herman, WH ;
Boyle, JP ;
Aubert, RE ;
Kenny, SJ ;
Badran, A ;
Sous, ES ;
Ali, MA .
DIABETES CARE, 1997, 20 (05) :785-791
[8]
FITZGERALD M, 1976, BRIT MED J, P35
[9]
Gavin JR, 1997, DIABETES CARE, V20, P1183
[10]
HARRIS M, 1979, DIABETES, V28, P1039