Single-agent gemcitabine: an active and better tolerated alternative to standard cisplatin-based chemotherapy in locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer

被引:59
作者
Huinink, WWT
Bergman, B
Chemaissani, A
Dornoff, W
Drings, P
Kellokumpu-Lehtinen, PL
Liippo, K
Mattson, K
von Pawel, J
Ricci, S
Sederholm, C
Stahel, RA
Wagenius, G
von Walree, N
Manegold, C
机构
[1] Netherlands Canc Inst, NL-1066 Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Salgrenska Sjukhuset, Gothenburg, Sweden
[3] Stadt Krankenhaus, Cologne, Germany
[4] Mutterhaus Borromaerinnen, Trier, Germany
[5] Thoraxklin, Heidelberg, Germany
[6] Tampere Univ Hosp, Pinkonlinna, Finland
[7] Turku Univ Hosp, Paimio, Finland
[8] Univ Helsinki Hosp, Helsinki, Finland
[9] Zent Krankenhaus, Gauting, Germany
[10] S Chiara Hosp, Pisa, Italy
[11] Univ Sjukhuset, Linkoping, Sweden
[12] Univ Spital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
[13] Univ Uppsala, Akad Sjukhuset, Uppsala, Sweden
[14] St Antonius Hosp, Nieuwegein, Netherlands
关键词
cisplatin; etoposide; gemcitabine; non-small cell lung cancer; randomized phase II study; quality of life; efficacy;
D O I
10.1016/S0169-5002(99)00067-7
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
This randomized study was designed to determine the response rates, survival and toxicities of single-agent gemcitabine (GEMZAR(TM)) and a combination of cisplatin/etoposide in chemonaive patients with non-resectable, locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) was given as a 30-min intravenous infusion on days 1, 8, 15 of a 28-day cycle, cisplatin 100 mg/m(2) on day 1, and etoposide 100 mg/m(2) on days 1 (following cisplatin), 2 and 3. Major eligibility criteria included histologically confirmed non-small cell lung cancer, measurable disease, Zubrod performance status 0-2, no prior chemotherapy, no prior radiation of the measured lesion, and no CNS metastases. One hundred and forty-seven patients were enrolled, 72 in the gemcitabine and 75 in the cisplatin/etoposide arm. Patient characteristics were well-matched across both arms. Sixty-seven gemcitabine and 72 cisplatin/etoposide patients were qualified for efficacy analysis. There were no complete responses, but 12 partial responses in the gemcitabine arm and 11 in the cisplatin/etoposide ann, for protocol-qualified response but 12 partial responses in the gemcitabine arm and 11 in the cisplatin/etoposide arm, for protocol-qualified response rates of 17.9% (95% CI: 9.6-29.2%) and 15.3% (95% CI: 7.9-25.7%), respectively. Median survival times were 6.6 months (95% CI: 4.9-7.3 months) for gemcitabine and 7.6 months (95% CI: 5.4-9.3 months) for cisplatin/etoposide. The 1-year survival probability estimate was 26% for gemcitabine and 24% for cisplatin/etoposide. There were no statistically significant between-group differences in time-to-event measures, but patients in the gemcitabine arm had a greater probability of achieving a tumour response after 2 months (probability estimate: 8 vs. 0%) and of the response lasting at least 6 months (73 vs. 45%). Clinical and haematologic toxicity was more pronounced in the cisplatin/etoposide arm. Quality-of-life measures indicated a significant worsening of symptomatology in the cisplatin/etoposide arm for hair loss, nausea and vomiting, and appetite loss. This randomized study provides further evidence that single-agent gemcitabine is an active and effective therapy for patients with non-resectable, locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC and good performance status, and that it is better tolerated than the combination cisplatin/etoposide. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:85 / 94
页数:10
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   EFFICACY AND SAFETY PROFILE OF GEMCITABINE IN NON-SMALL-CELL LUNG-CANCER - A PHASE-II STUDY [J].
ABRATT, RP ;
BEZWODA, WR ;
FALKSON, G ;
GOEDHALS, L ;
HACKING, D ;
RUGG, TA .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1994, 12 (08) :1535-1540
[2]  
ALBERTI W, 1995, BRIT MED J, V311, P899
[3]   SINGLE-AGENT ACTIVITY OF WEEKLY GEMCITABINE IN ADVANCED NON-SMALL-CELL LUNG-CANCER - A PHASE-II STUDY [J].
ANDERSON, H ;
LUND, B ;
BACH, F ;
THATCHER, N ;
WALLING, J ;
HANSEN, HH .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1994, 12 (09) :1821-1826
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1979, HDB REP RES CANC TRE
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1992, MANUAL STAGING CANC
[6]   THE EORTC QLQ-LC13 - A MODULAR SUPPLEMENT TO THE EORTC CORE QUALITY-OF-LIFE QUESTIONNAIRE (QLQ-C30) FOR USE IN LUNG-CANCER CLINICAL-TRIALS [J].
BERGMAN, B ;
AARONSON, NK ;
AHMEDZAI, S ;
KAASA, S ;
SULLIVAN, M .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1994, 30A (05) :635-642
[7]   PHASE-II TRIAL OF ACIVICIN VERSUS ETOPOSIDE-CISPLATIN IN NONSMALL CELL LUNG-CANCER - AN EASTERN-COOPERATIVE-ONCOLOGY-GROUP STUDY [J].
BONOMI, P ;
FINKELSTEIN, D ;
CHANG, A .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 1994, 17 (03) :215-217
[8]   COMBINATION CHEMOTHERAPY VERSUS SINGLE AGENTS FOLLOWED BY COMBINATION CHEMOTHERAPY IN STAGE-IV NON-SMALL-CELL LUNG-CANCER - A STUDY OF THE EASTERN-COOPERATIVE-ONCOLOGY-GROUP [J].
BONOMI, PD ;
FINKELSTEIN, DM ;
RUCKDESCHEL, JC ;
BLUM, RH ;
GREEN, MD ;
MASON, B ;
HAHN, R ;
TORMEY, DC ;
HARRIS, J ;
COMIS, R ;
GLICK, J .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1989, 7 (11) :1602-1613
[9]   ON THE RECEIVING END PATIENT PERCEPTION OF THE SIDE-EFFECTS OF CANCER-CHEMOTHERAPY [J].
COATES, A ;
ABRAHAM, S ;
KAYE, SB ;
SOWERBUTTS, T ;
FREWIN, C ;
FOX, RM ;
TATTERSALL, MHN .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER & CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1983, 19 (02) :203-208
[10]   A RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF 3 CISPLATIN-CONTAINING REGIMENS IN ADVANCED NON-SMALL-CELL LUNG-CANCER (NSCLC) - A STUDY OF THE UMBRIAN-LUNG-CANCER-GROUP [J].
CRINO, L ;
TONATO, M ;
DARWISH, S ;
MEACCI, ML ;
CORGNA, E ;
DICOSTANZO, F ;
BUZZI, F ;
FORNARI, G ;
SANTI, E ;
BALLATORI, E ;
SANTUCCI, C ;
DAVIS, S .
CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 1990, 26 (01) :52-56