Histopathologic parameters in the evaluation of T1 squamous cell carcinomas of the oral cavity

被引:31
作者
Bundgaard, T [1 ]
Rossen, K
Henriksen, SD
Charabi, S
Sogaard, H
Grau, C
机构
[1] Aarhus Univ Hosp, ENT Dept, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
[2] Bispebjerg Hosp, Dept Pathol, Bispebjerg, Denmark
[3] Gentofte Univ Hosp, ENT Dept, Gentofte, Denmark
[4] Aarhus Univ Hosp, Dept Pathol, DK-8000 Aarhus, Denmark
[5] Aarhus Univ Hosp, Dept Oncol, DK-8000 Aarhus, Denmark
来源
HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK | 2002年 / 24卷 / 07期
关键词
oral cancer; histopathology; prognosis;
D O I
10.1002/hed.10120
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Background. Prognostic indicators that could assist in a more precise selection of patients with small oral carcinomas for differentiated therapy would be valuable. A significant fraction of patients with stage I disease have a relatively poor prognosis despite the small size of the tumor, but in general stage I tumors of the oral cavity have a favorable prognosis. Methods. Seventy-eight patients with stage I (T1NOMO) oral squamous cell carcinoma from two different ENT departments were included in the study. The pretreatment biopsy specimens were graded according to the modified classification of Jakobsson et al. Eight individual parameters were recorded, four parameters describing the tumor cell population and four parameters describing the tumor/host interaction. Results. The only significant prognostic parameter for disease-specific survival was "mode of invasion." The histologic mean score was not significantly correlated to disease-specific or crude survival. Conclusions. Mode of invasion Is the most important histologic parameter when evaluating the prognosis. Histologic evaluation of small squamous cell carcinomas of the oral cavity may assist the design of a differentiated treatment strategy (eg, monotherapy vs combined treatment). (C) 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:656 / 660
页数:5
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]  
ANNEROTH G, 1987, SCAND J DENT RES, V95, P229
[2]  
Bundgaard T, 1996, HEAD NECK-J SCI SPEC, V18, P142, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0347(199603/04)18:2<142::AID-HED6>3.3.CO
[3]  
2-L
[4]  
CRISSMAN JD, 1984, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V54, P2995, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19841215)54:12<2995::AID-CNCR2820541230>3.0.CO
[5]  
2-R
[6]  
Hiratsuka H, 1997, CANCER, V80, P351
[7]  
JAKOBSSON PA, 1973, ACTA RADIOL THER PHY, V12, P1
[8]   EPIDERMOID CARCINOMA OF TONGUE - HISTOLOGIC GRADING IN CLINICAL EVALUATION [J].
LUND, C ;
SOGAARD, H ;
ELBROND, O ;
JORGENSEN, K ;
ANDERSEN, AP .
ACTA RADIOLOGICA-THERAPY PHYSICS BIOLOGY, 1975, 14 (06) :513-521
[9]  
MANTEL NATHAN, 1966, CANCERCHEMOTHERAP REP, V50, P163
[10]   DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIALS REQUIRING PROLONGED OBSERVATION OF EACH PATIENT .2. ANALYSIS AND EXAMPLES [J].
PETO, R ;
PIKE, MC ;
ARMITAGE, P ;
BRESLOW, NE ;
COX, DR ;
HOWARD, SV ;
MANTEL, N ;
MCPHERSON, K ;
PETO, J ;
SMITH, PG .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1977, 35 (01) :1-39