An economic and environmental comparison of a biochemical and a thermochemical lignocellulosic ethanol conversion processes

被引:141
作者
Foust, Thomas D. [1 ]
Aden, Andy [1 ]
Dutta, Abhijit [1 ]
Phillips, Steven [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Renewable Energy Lab, Natl Bioenergy Ctr, Golden, CO 80401 USA
关键词
Biofuel; Biochemical; Thermochemical; Biomass; Feedstock; Ethanol; Corn stover; Gasification; Catalyst; Fuel synthesis; Pretreatment; Enzymatic hydrolysis; Fermentation; Energy efficiency; Emission; Inhibitor; Recycle; Mixed alcohol; BIOMASS-DERIVED SYNGAS; TRANSPORTATION FUELS; CORN STOVER; GASIFICATION; PYROLYSIS; CATALYST; FERMENTATION; TECHNOLOGIES; ALCOHOLS; BIOFUELS;
D O I
10.1007/s10570-009-9317-x
中图分类号
TB3 [工程材料学]; TS [轻工业、手工业、生活服务业];
学科分类号
0805 ; 080502 ; 0822 ;
摘要
With the world's focus on rapidly deploying second generation biofuels technologies, there exists today a good deal of interest in how yields, economics, and environmental impacts of the various conversion processes of lignocellulosic biomass to transportation fuels compare. Although there is a good deal of information regarding these conversion processes, this information is typically very difficult to use on a comparison basis because different underlying assumptions, such as feedstock costs, plant size, co-product credits or assumed state of technology, have been utilized. In this study, a rigorous comparison of different biomass to transportation fuels conversion processes was performed with standard underlying economic and environmental assumptions so that exact comparisons can be made. This study looked at promising second-generation conversion processes utilizing biochemical and thermochemical gasification technologies on both a current and an achievable state of technology in 2012. The fundamental finding of this study is that although the biochemical and thermochemical processes to ethanol analyzed have their individual strengths and weaknesses, the two processes have very comparable yields, economics, and environmental impacts. Hence, this study concludes that based on this analysis there is not a distinct economic or environmental impact difference between biochemical and thermochemical gasification processes for second generation ethanol production.
引用
收藏
页码:547 / 565
页数:19
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]  
ADEN A, 2007, SW HYDROLOGY MAG SEP, V6
[2]   Effect of fly ash and H2S on a Ni-based catalyst for the upgrading of a biomass-generated [J].
Albertazzi, S. ;
Basile, F. ;
Brandin, J. ;
Einvall, J. ;
Fornasari, G. ;
Hulteberg, C. ;
Sanati, M. ;
Trifiro, F. ;
Vaccari, A. .
BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2008, 32 (04) :345-353
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2007, NREL/TP-510-41168
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2008, BIOCH PRODUCTION ETH
[5]  
[Anonymous], WRS0801 USDA EC RES
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2002, LIGNOCELLULOSIC BIOM
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2008, 4682 WORLD BANK DEV
[8]  
[Anonymous], 1998, BIOMASS GASIFIER TAR
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2003, NAT RENEW ENERGY LAB, DOI DOI 10.2172/15006100
[10]   Evaluation of catalyst deactivation during catalytic steam reforming of biomass-derived syngas [J].
Bain, RL ;
Dayton, DC ;
Carpenter, DL ;
Czernik, SR ;
Feik, CJ ;
French, RJ ;
Magrini-Bair, KA ;
Phillips, SD .
INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 2005, 44 (21) :7945-7956