Two-dimensional full wavefield inversion of wide-aperture marine seismic streamer data

被引:287
作者
Shipp, RM
Singh, SC
机构
[1] Univ Cambridge, Dept Earth Sci, Bullard Labs, Cambridge CB3 0EZ, England
[2] LITHOS, Bullard Labs, Cambridge, England
关键词
finite-difference methods; inversion; seismic modelling; seismic structure; tomography; waveform analysis;
D O I
10.1046/j.1365-246X.2002.01645.x
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
A 2-D full wavefield inversion method is presented for the processing of wide-aperture data. The diversity of information contained within such datasets may be handled in a complete manner by first matching the traveltimes of the main events and then progressing to waveform fitting of the data through explicit full wavefield modelling. Our wavefield inversion scheme is based upon a finite difference solution of the 2-D elastic wave equation in the time distance domain. The strength of adopting such an approach is the ability to generate all possible wave types within a given 2-D model (multiples, converted waves, etc.) and thus to simulate and accurately model complex seismic wavefields. The aim of the inversion is to find the 2-D P-wave velocity model that minimizes the least squared difference between the observed and synthetic data across the full range of offsets. Following extensive testing on synthetic data, the wavefield inversion scheme has been applied to wide-aperture real marine seismic streamer datasets. We present results from the synthetic testing and the wavefield inversion of wide-aperture real data out to 12 km offset that was recorded on a single streamer. Even though current computational restrictions allow only a small subsection of the data to be analysed, these examples demonstrate the potential value of wide-aperture 2-D full wavefield inversion.
引用
收藏
页码:325 / 344
页数:20
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   2-1/2 DIMENSIONAL INPLANE WAVE-PROPAGATION [J].
BLEISTEIN, N .
GEOPHYSICAL PROSPECTING, 1986, 34 (05) :686-703
[2]   MULTISCALE SEISMIC WAVE-FORM INVERSION [J].
BUNKS, C ;
SALECK, FM ;
ZALESKI, S ;
CHAVENT, G .
GEOPHYSICS, 1995, 60 (05) :1457-1473
[3]   RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN COMPRESSIONAL-WAVE AND SHEAR-WAVE VELOCITIES IN CLASTIC SILICATE ROCKS [J].
CASTAGNA, JP ;
BATZLE, ML ;
EASTWOOD, RL .
GEOPHYSICS, 1985, 50 (04) :571-581
[4]   ROBUST ELASTIC NONLINEAR WAVE-FORM INVERSION - APPLICATION TO REAL DATA [J].
CRASE, E ;
PICA, A ;
NOBLE, M ;
MCDONALD, J ;
TARANTOLA, A .
GEOPHYSICS, 1990, 55 (05) :527-538
[5]   Multiparameter l1 norm waveform fitting:: Interpretation of Gulf of Mexico reflection seismograms [J].
Djikpéssé, HA ;
Tarantola, A .
GEOPHYSICS, 1999, 64 (04) :1023-1035
[6]  
FLIEDNER M, 1998, 68 M SOC EXPL GEOPHY
[7]  
FREUDENREICH Y, 2000, 62 M EUR ASS GEOSC E
[8]   FORMATION VELOCITY AND DENSITY - DIAGNOSTIC BASICS FOR STRATIGRAPHIC TRAPS [J].
GARDNER, GHF ;
GARDNER, LW ;
GREGORY, AR .
GEOPHYSICS, 1974, 39 (06) :770-780
[9]  
HAGUE P, 1995, 57 M EUR ASS GEOSC E
[10]   SOUND VELOCITY-DENSITY RELATIONS IN SEA-FLOOR SEDIMENTS AND ROCKS [J].
HAMILTON, EL .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1978, 63 (02) :366-377