Histopathological grading does not affect survival after R0 surgery for gastric cancer

被引:13
作者
Inoue, K [1 ]
Nakane, Y [1 ]
Michiura, T [1 ]
Nakai, K [1 ]
Iiyama, H [1 ]
Sato, M [1 ]
Okumura, S [1 ]
Yamamichi, K [1 ]
Hioki, K [1 ]
机构
[1] Kansai Med Univ, Dept Surg 2, Moriguchi, Osaka 5708507, Japan
来源
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY | 2002年 / 28卷 / 06期
关键词
stomach neoplasms; histology; pathology; prognosis; TNM classification;
D O I
10.1053/ejso.2002.1310
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Aim: It is unclear whether Histopathological Grading (UICC, TNM Classification) affects survival after resection for gastric cancer. Methods: To investigate the prognostic significance of Histopathological Grading after gastrectomy, 1455 patients who underwent gastric resection for gastric adenocarcinoma were reviewed. Results: The R0 (UICC, R Classification) resection rate was inversely correlated with the grade (86.5% for Grade 1, 79.7% for Grade 2 and 69.2% for Grade 3) and the R1 and R2 resection rates increased with the grade. The Histopathological Grading did not influence survival in the 1 119 patients who underwent R0 resection (71.0% for Grade 1, 65.7% for Grade 2 and 66.7% for Grade 3). When multivariate analysis was performed for the 1 119 cases undergoing R0 resection, the Histopathological Grading was not a determinant prognostic factor. Conclusion: We conclude that the UICC Histopathological Grading affects R0 resection rates, but does not affect survival independently. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:633 / 636
页数:4
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
Adachi Y, 2000, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V89, P1418
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1990, HISTOLOGICAL TYPING
[3]  
CIMERMAN M, 1994, INT SURG, V79, P27
[4]   GASTRIC ADENOCARCINOMA - PROGNOSTIC-SIGNIFICANCE OF SEVERAL PATHOLOGICAL PARAMETERS AND HISTOLOGIC CLASSIFICATIONS [J].
DAVESSAR, K ;
PEZZULLO, JC ;
KESSIMIAN, N ;
HALE, JH ;
JAUREGUI, HO .
HUMAN PATHOLOGY, 1990, 21 (03) :325-332
[5]   DIFFERENCES IN THE MODE OF THE EXTENSION OF GASTRIC-CANCER CLASSIFIED BY HISTOLOGICAL TYPE - NEW HISTOLOGICAL CLASSIFICATION OF GASTRIC-CARCINOMA [J].
GOSEKI, N ;
TAKIZAWA, T ;
KOIKE, M .
GUT, 1992, 33 (05) :606-612
[6]  
Hermanek, 1993, TNM SUPPLEMENT 1993, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-46792-9
[7]   PTNM AND RESIDUAL TUMOR CLASSIFICATIONS PROBLEMS OF ASSESSMENT AND PROGNOSTIC-SIGNIFICANCE [J].
HERMANEK, P .
WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1995, 19 (02) :184-190
[8]  
*INT UN AG CANC, 1997, TNM CLASS MAL TUM
[9]   PROGNOSTIC-SIGNIFICANCE OF HISTOLOGICAL TYPE IN GASTRIC-CARCINOMA WITH INVASION CONFINED TO THE STOMACH WALL [J].
IRIYAMA, K ;
MIKI, C ;
ILUNGA, K ;
OSAWA, T ;
TSUCHIBASHI, T ;
SUZUKI, H .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1993, 80 (07) :890-892
[10]  
Japanese Gastric Cancer Association, 1998, Gastric Cancer, V1, P10