RETRACTED: Energy storage system and demand response program effects on stochastic energy procurement of large consumers considering renewable generation (Retracted article. See vol. 14, pg. 6040, 2020)

被引:99
作者
Aalami, Habib Allah [1 ]
Nojavan, Sayyad [2 ]
机构
[1] Imam Hussein Univ, Dept Elect Engn, Tehran, Iran
[2] Univ Tabriz, Fac Elect & Comp Engn, Tabriz, Iran
关键词
energy storage; renewable energy sources; photovoltaic power systems; wind turbines; power markets; contracts; normal distribution; Weibull distribution; energy storage system; demand response program effects; renewable generation; stochastic energy procurement problem; large electricity consumer; multiple energy procurement sources; photovoltaic system; wind turbine; power market; bilateral contracts; self-generation units; uncertainty models; market price; power uncertainty; wind speed; Kantorovich distance; ELECTRICITY PROCUREMENT; RISK; PRICE;
D O I
10.1049/iet-gtd.2015.0473
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
The stochastic energy procurement problem (SEPP) of large electricity consumer (LEC) with multiple energy procurement sources (EPSs) is proposed in this study. Also, the effects of demand response program (DRP) and energy storage system (ESS) on SEPP are studied in this work. The EPSs contain renewable energy sources (RESs), which include photovoltaic (PV) system and wind-turbine (WT), power market (PM), bilateral contracts and self-generation units. Also, the ESS (like as battery) and DRP are integrated in the SEPP by decision-maker of LEC to reduce the expected energy procurement cost. In the SEPP, the uncertainty models of market price, load and output power of RES (PV and WT) are considered. The normal distribution is used to generate scenarios for price, load and errors of temperature and insulation for PV output power uncertainty modelling. Also, the Weibull distribution is used to generate scenarios for wind speed for WT output power uncertainty modelling. Furthermore, the fast-forward selection based on Kantorovich distance approach is used for scenarios reduction. Actually, a case study is used to illustrate the capability and efficiency of the proposed SEPP.
引用
收藏
页码:107 / 114
页数:8
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] Evaluation of nonlinear models for time-based rates demand response programs
    Aalami, H. A.
    Moghaddam, M. Parsa
    Yousefi, G. R.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL POWER & ENERGY SYSTEMS, 2015, 65 : 282 - 290
  • [2] Modeling and prioritizing demand response programs in power markets
    Aalami, H. A.
    Moghaddam, M. Parsa
    Yousefi, G. R.
    [J]. ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2010, 80 (04) : 426 - 435
  • [3] Demand response modeling considering Interruptible/Curtailable loads and capacity market programs
    Aalami, H. A.
    Moghaddam, M. Parsa
    Yousefi, G. R.
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2010, 87 (01) : 243 - 250
  • [4] Optimal operation scheduling of wind power integrated with compressed air energy storage (CAES)
    Abbaspour, M.
    Satkin, M.
    Mohammadi-Ivatloo, B.
    Lotfi, F. Hoseinzadeh
    Noorollahi, Y.
    [J]. RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2013, 51 : 53 - 59
  • [5] BROOKE A, 1990, GAMS USERS GUIDE
  • [6] A stochastic programming approach to electric energy procurement for large consumers
    Carrion, Miguel
    Philpott, Andy B.
    Conejo, Antonio J.
    Arroyo, Jose M.
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2007, 22 (02) : 744 - 754
  • [7] Risk-constrained electricity procurement for a large consumer
    Conejo, A. J.
    Carrin, M.
    [J]. IEE PROCEEDINGS-GENERATION TRANSMISSION AND DISTRIBUTION, 2006, 153 (04) : 407 - 413
  • [8] Energy procurement for large consumers in electricity markets
    Conejo, AJ
    Fernández-González, JJ
    Alguacil, N
    [J]. IEE PROCEEDINGS-GENERATION TRANSMISSION AND DISTRIBUTION, 2005, 152 (03) : 357 - 364
  • [9] Conejo AJ, 2010, INT SER OPER RES MAN, V153, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4419-7421-1
  • [10] OPTIMAL DEMAND-SIDE RESPONSE TO ELECTRICITY SPOT PRICES FOR STORAGE-TYPE CUSTOMERS
    DARYANIAN, B
    BOHN, RE
    TABORS, RD
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 1989, 4 (03) : 897 - 903