Intraperitoneal chemotherapy for ovarian cancer

被引:33
作者
Hamilton, Chad A. [1 ]
Berek, Jonathan S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Sch Med, Ctr Canc,Div Gynecol Oncol, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
front-line treatment; intraperitoneal chemotherapy; ovarian cancer;
D O I
10.1097/01.cco.0000239892.21161.18
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 [肿瘤学];
摘要
Purpose of review Intraperitoneal chemotherapy for ovarian cancer is based on sound pharmacological principles and is technically feasible. There is mounting evidence, bolstered by a recent randomized trial, that in certain patients, this route of delivery may be superior to traditional intravenous chemotherapy: This review explores the background and pharmacokinetic principles of intraperitoneal chemotherapy, the recent evidence supporting an intraperitoneal approach, and some of the logistical and technical challenges involved. Recent findings Intraperitoneal chemotherapy has been evaluated in several settings. Most phase I and II data came from second-line treatment, of ovarian cancer, and there have been a few series, including one recent phase III trial, exploring intraperitoneal consolidation. The greatest impact among recent studies will be from a large, intergroup phase III trial evaluating intraperitoneal therapy in the front-line setting: This study will probably change the dialogue of standard treatment for optimally cytoreduced, advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. Summary Based on recent findings; intraperitoneal chemotherapy should be considered for the front-line treatment of women with minimal residual advanced ovarian cancer. Efforts should continue to facilitate the integration of intraperitoneal treatment into mainstream practice, and future trials should be designed to address lingering controversy surrounding this route of treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:507 / 515
页数:9
相关论文
共 93 条
[1]
ALBERTS DS, 1988, CANCER RES, V48, P5874
[2]
ALBERTS DS, 1985, SEMIN ONCOL, V12, P38
[3]
Randomized trial of adjuvant intraperitoneal alpha-interferon in stage III ovarian cancer patients who have no evidence of disease after primary surgery and chemotherapy: An intergroup study [J].
Alberts, DS ;
Hannigan, EV ;
Liu, PY ;
Jiang, C ;
Wilczynski, S ;
Copeland, L ;
Markman, M .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2006, 100 (01) :133-138
[4]
Intraperitoneal cisplatin plus intravenous cyclophosphamide versus intravenous cisplatin plus intravenous cyclophosphamide for stage III ovarian cancer [J].
Alberts, DS ;
Liu, PY ;
Hannigan, EV ;
OToole, R ;
Williams, SD ;
Young, JA ;
Franklin, EW ;
ClarkePearson, DL ;
Malviya, VK ;
DuBeshter, B ;
Adelson, MD ;
Hoskins, WJ .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1996, 335 (26) :1950-1955
[5]
Intraperitoneal therapy for stage III ovarian cancer: A therapy whose time has come! [J].
Alberts, DS ;
Markman, M ;
Armstrong, D ;
Rothenberg, ML ;
Muggia, F ;
Howell, SB .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2002, 20 (19) :3944-3946
[6]
Intraperitoneal cisplatin and paclitaxel in ovarian cancer [J].
Armstrong, DK ;
Bundy, B ;
Wenzel, L ;
Huang, HQ ;
Baergen, R ;
Lele, S ;
Copeland, LJ ;
Walker, JL ;
Burger, RA .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2006, 354 (01) :34-43
[7]
Atkins CD, 2003, J CLIN ONCOL, V21, P957, DOI 10.1200/JCO.2003.99.206
[8]
A phase II trial of intraperitoneal cisplatin and etoposide as consolidation therapy in patients with stage II-IV epithelial ovarian cancer following negative surgical assessment [J].
Barakat, RR ;
Almadrones, L ;
Venkatraman, ES ;
Aghajanian, C ;
Brown, C ;
Shapiro, F ;
Curtin, JP ;
Spriggs, D .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 1998, 69 (01) :17-22
[9]
Intraperitoneal chemotherapy for ovarian carcinoma: Results of long-term follow-up [J].
Barakat, RR ;
Sabbatini, P ;
Bhaskaran, D ;
Revzin, M ;
Smith, A ;
Venkatraman, E ;
Aghajanian, C ;
Hensley, M ;
Soignet, S ;
Brown, C ;
Soslow, R ;
Markman, M ;
Hoskins, WJ ;
Spriggs, D .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2002, 20 (03) :694-698
[10]
BEREK JS, 1989, OBSTET GYNECOL, V74, P663