Major source categories for PM2.5 in Pittsburgh using PMF and UNMIX

被引:80
作者
Pekney, Natalie J.
Davidson, Cliff I.
Robinson, Allen
Zhou, Liming
Hopke, Philip
Eatough, Delbert
Rogge, Wolfgang F.
机构
[1] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[2] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn & Engn & Publ Policy, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[3] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Dept Mech Engn & Engn & Publ Policy, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[4] Clarkson Univ, Ctr Air Resources Engn & Sci, Potsdam, NY USA
[5] Clarkson Univ, Dept Chem Engn, Potsdam, NY USA
[6] Brigham Young Univ, Dept Chem & Biochem, Provo, UT 84602 USA
[7] Florida Int Univ, Ctr Engn, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Miami, FL 33199 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1080/02786820500380271
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
An objective of the Pittsburgh Air Quality Study was to determine the major sources Of PM2.5 in the Pittsburgh region. Daily 24-hour averaged filter-based data were collected for 13 months, starting in July 2001, including sulfate and nitrate data from IC analysis, trace element data from ICP-MS analysis, and organic and elemental carbon from the thermal optical transmittance (TOT) method and the NIOSH thermal evolution protocol. These data were used in two source-receptor models, Unmix and PMF. Unmix, which is limited to a maximum number of seven factors, resolved six source factors, including crustal material, a regional transport factor, secondary nitrate, an iron, zinc and manganese factor, specialty steel production and processing, and cadmium. PMF, which has no limit to the number of factors, apportioned the PM2.5 mass into ten factors, including crustal material, secondary sulfate, primary OC and EC, secondary nitrate, an iron, zinc and manganese factor, specialty steel production and processing, cadmium, selenium, lead, and a gallium-rich factor. The Unmix and PMF common factors agree reasonably well, both in composition and contributions to PM2.5. To further identify and apportion the sources Of PM2.5, specific OC compounds that are known markers of some sources were added to the PMF analysis. The results were similar to the original solution, except that the primary OC and EC factor split into two factors. One factor was associated with vehicles as identified by the hopanes, PAH's, and other OC compounds. The other factor had strong correlations with the OC and EC ambient data as well as wood smoke markers such as levoglucosan, syringols, and resin acids.
引用
收藏
页码:910 / 924
页数:15
相关论文
共 65 条
[1]   The regional nature of PM2.5 episodes in the upper Ohio River Valley [J].
Anderson, RR ;
Martello, DV ;
White, CM ;
Crist, KC ;
John, K ;
Modey, WK ;
Eatough, DJ .
JOURNAL OF THE AIR & WASTE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, 2004, 54 (08) :971-984
[2]   Processing to obtain high-purity gallium [J].
Bautista, RG .
JOM-JOURNAL OF THE MINERALS METALS & MATERIALS SOCIETY, 2003, 55 (03) :23-26
[3]  
BERNARDOBRICKER A, 2005, IN PRESS ATMOSPHERIC
[4]   Sources of atmospheric carbonaceous particulate matter in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania [J].
Cabada, JC ;
Pandis, SN ;
Robinson, AL .
JOURNAL OF THE AIR & WASTE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, 2002, 52 (06) :732-741
[5]   Light scattering by fine particles during the Pittsburgh Air Quality Study: measurements and modeling [J].
Cabada, JC ;
Khlystov, A ;
Wittig, AE ;
Pilinis, C ;
Pandis, SN .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2004, 109 (D16) :D16S031-13
[6]   AN ASSOCIATION BETWEEN AIR-POLLUTION AND MORTALITY IN 6 UNITED-STATES CITIES [J].
DOCKERY, DW ;
POPE, CA ;
XU, XP ;
SPENGLER, JD ;
WARE, JH ;
FAY, ME ;
FERRIS, BG ;
SPEIZER, FE .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1993, 329 (24) :1753-1759
[7]  
EATOUGH DJ, 2005, IN PRESS AEROSOL SCI
[8]   Source apportionment of fine particulate matter in Houston, TX, using organic molecular markers [J].
Fraser, MP ;
Yue, ZW ;
Buzcu, B .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2003, 37 (15) :2117-2123
[10]  
Henry RC., 2001, UNMIX VERSION 2 4 MA