Comparison of the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of propiverine and oxybutynin for the treatment of overactive bladder syndrome

被引:40
作者
Abrams, Paul
Cardozo, Linda
Chapple, Christopher
Serdarevic, Dzelal
Hargreaves, Katherine
Khullar, Vikram
机构
[1] Pfizer Global Res & Dev, Sandwich Labs UK, Sandwich CT13 9NJ, Kent, England
[2] Bristol Urol Inst, Bristol, Avon, England
[3] Kings Coll Hosp London, Dept Womens Hlth, London, England
[4] Royal Hallamshire Hosp, Dept Urol, Sheffield S10 2JF, S Yorkshire, England
[5] Imperial Coll Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, London, England
关键词
ambulatory urodynamic monitoring; overactive bladder; oxybutynin; propiverine; safety;
D O I
10.1111/j.1442-2042.2006.01387.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aim: To compare the effects of propiverine and oxybutynin on ambulatory urodynamic monitoring (AUM) parameters, safety, and tolerability in patients with overactive bladder. Methods: This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre, crossover study. Patients (n = 77) received two of the following treatments during two 2-week periods: propiverine 20 mg once daily, propiverine 15 mg three times daily, oxybutynin 5 mg three times daily, and placebo. AUM parameters, salivary flow, visual near point, and heart rate were assessed. Results: A consistent order in the efficacy between active treatment groups was observed for the reduction in mean involuntary detrusor contractions (IDCs; oxybutynin 15 mg <= propiverine 45 mg <= propiverine 20 mg). Differences between the oxybutynin and propiverine 20 mg groups were statistically significant for several AUM endpoints. Statistically significant differences between the oxybutynin and both propiverine groups were also noted in salivary flow rate and heart rate (oxybutynin 15 mg < both propiverine regimens) and in heart rate variability (both propiverine regimens < oxybutynin 15 mg). All active treatments lengthened visual near point. The incidence of dry mouth was significantly more pronounced in the oxybutynin group than in either propiverine group. Treatment with propiverine 45 mg resulted in the highest rates of constipation, lengthening of the visual near point, and effects on heart rate. Conclusions: Oxybutynin 15 mg was more effective than propiverine 20 mg in reducing symptomatic and asymptomatic IDCs in ambulatory patients. The primary differences between the two drugs were the incidence and type of adverse events, which varied with the antimuscarinic receptor specificity of each agent.
引用
收藏
页码:692 / 698
页数:7
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Factors involved in the success of antimuscarinic treatment [J].
Abrams, P ;
Larsson, G ;
Chapple, C ;
Wein, AJ .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 1999, 83 :42-47
[2]   The standardisation of terminology in lower urinary tract function: Report from the standardisation sub-committee of the International Continence Society (Reprinted from Neurourology and Urodynamics, vol 21, pg 167-178, 2002) [J].
Abrams, P ;
Cardozo, L ;
Fall, M ;
Griffiths, D ;
Rosier, P ;
Ulmsten, U ;
Van Kerrebroeck, P ;
Victor, A ;
Wein, A .
UROLOGY, 2003, 61 (01) :37-49
[3]   Oxybutynin and the overactive bladder [J].
Andersson, KE ;
Chapple, CR .
WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2001, 19 (05) :319-323
[4]   Clinical efficacy and safety of tolterodine in the treatment of overactive bladder: A pooled analysis [J].
Appell, RA .
UROLOGY, 1997, 50 (6A) :90-96
[5]  
BRADSHAW H, 2001, INT CONT SOC SEPT 18
[6]   Behavioral vs drug treatment for urge urinary incontinence in older women - A randomized controlled trial [J].
Burgio, KL ;
Locher, JL ;
Goode, PS ;
Hardin, JM ;
McDowell, BJ ;
Dombrowski, M ;
Candib, D .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1998, 280 (23) :1995-2000
[7]   Biofeedback in overactive bladder [J].
Cardozo, LD .
UROLOGY, 2000, 55 (5A) :24-28
[8]   Muscarinic receptor subtypes and management of the overactive bladder [J].
Chapple, CR ;
Yamanishi, T ;
Chess-Williams, R .
UROLOGY, 2002, 60 (5A) :82-88
[9]   Clinical pharmacokinetics of drugs used to treat urge incontinence [J].
Guay, DRP .
CLINICAL PHARMACOKINETICS, 2003, 42 (14) :1243-1285
[10]  
Kaufman A, 2000, UROLOGY, V55, P31