The value of medical history and physical examination in diagnosing sacroiliac joint pain

被引:317
作者
Dreyfuss, P
Michaelsen, M
Pauza, K
McLarty, J
Bogduk, N
机构
[1] SPINE SPECIALISTS,TYLER,TX
[2] UNIV TEXAS,HLTH SCI CTR,DEPT REHABIL MED,SAN ANTONIO,TX
[3] MICHAELSEN CHIROPRACT CTR,TYLER,TX
[4] UNIV TEXAS,CTR HLTH,DEPT EPIDEMIOL BIOMATH,TYLER,TX 75710
[5] UNIV NEWCASTLE,FAC MED & HLTH SCI,NEWCASTLE,NSW 2308,AUSTRALIA
关键词
diagnosis; injection; pain; physical examination; sacroiliac joint;
D O I
10.1097/00007632-199611150-00009
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design. This prospective study evaluated the diagnostic utility of historically accepted sacroiliac joint tests, A multidisciplinary expert panel recommended 12 or the ''best'' sacroiliac joint tests to be evaluated against a criterion standard of unequivocal pain relief after an intra-articular injection of local anesthetic into the sacroiliac joint. Objectives. To identify a single sacroiliac joint test or ensemble of tests that are sufficiently useful in diagnosing sacroiliac joint disorders to be clinically valuable. Summary of Background Data. No previous research has been done to evaluate any physical test of sacroiliac joint pain against an accepted criterion standard. Methods. Historical data was obtained, and the 12 tests were performed by two examiners 85 patients who subsequently underwent sacroiliac joint blocks. Ninety percent or more relief was considered a positive response, and less then 90% relief was considered a negative response. Results. There were 45 positive and 40 negative responses, No historical feature, none of the 12 sacroiliac joint tests, and no ensemble of these 12 tests demonstrated worthwhile diagnostic value. Conclusion. Sacroiliac joint pain is resistant to identification by the historical and physical examination data from tests evaluated in this study.
引用
收藏
页码:2594 / 2602
页数:9
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
APRILL CN, 1992, P 1 INT WORLD C LOW, P373
[2]   FALSE-POSITIVE RATES OF CERVICAL ZYGAPOPHYSIAL JOINT BLOCKS [J].
BARNSLEY, L ;
LORD, S ;
WALLIS, B ;
BOGDUK, N .
CLINICAL JOURNAL OF PAIN, 1993, 9 (02) :124-130
[3]  
BEAL MC, 1982, J AM OSTEOPATH ASSOC, V81, P667
[4]   WHAT DO WE KNOW ABOUT THE SACROILIAC JOINT [J].
BELLAMY, N ;
PARK, W ;
ROONEY, PJ .
SEMINARS IN ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 1983, 12 (03) :282-313
[5]  
Bernard TN., 1991, The adult spine: Principles and practice, P2107
[6]  
BERNARD TN, 1987, CLIN ORTHOPAEDICS, V217, P266
[7]  
BOGDUK N, 1995, SPINE CARE DIAGNOSIS, P298
[8]  
BORENSTERIN D, 1989, MED DIAGNOSIS COMPRE, P59
[9]  
CARMICHAEL JP, 1987, J MANIP PHYSIOL THER, V10, P164
[10]  
Cassidy JD, 1992, PRINCIPLES PRACTICE, P211