Stakeholders′ opinions regarding important measures of nursing home quality for consumers

被引:15
作者
Harrington, C
Mullan, J
Woodruff, LC
Burger, SG
Carrillo, H
Bedney, B
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Social & Behav Sci, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[2] Natl Citizen Coalit Nursing Home Reford, Washington, DC USA
[3] Univ Maryland Baltimore Cty, Baltimore, MD 21228 USA
[4] Univ Illinois, Chicago, IL USA
关键词
D O I
10.1177/106286069901400304
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
This article reports on a survey of opinions about specific categories and indicators of quality used by the Health Care Financing Administration in the survey and certification process for nursing homes in the US. The survey was conducted of a selected sample of administrators, directors of nursing, state survey agency training coordinators, state ombudsmen, and nursing home advocates in 1996. General patterns of agreement were found across all respondent groups that the 3 most important categories of quality were as follows: quality of care, quality of life, and residents' rights. The 3 most important quality-of-care survey items were as follows: general quality of care, maintenance of activities of daily living, and appropriate treatment for impairment in activities of daily living. The 3 most important quality-of-life items were as follows: dignity, self-determination and participation, and accommodation of resident needs. important residents' rights items were as follows: to be able to exercise general rights, to be informed of one's condition, and to be free of reprisal when making complaints. Quality assurance should focus greater attention on the areas considered to be the most important by the various stakeholders in nursing home care.
引用
收藏
页码:124 / 132
页数:9
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1980, Exploration in quality assessment and monitoring Vol. 1: The definition of quality and approaches to its assessment
[2]  
[Anonymous], SOCIAL PSYCHOL SOCIO
[3]  
Burger S. G., 1996, NURSING HOMES GETTIN
[4]   THE EFFECTS OF OWNERSHIP ON INSTITUTIONAL SERVICES [J].
ELWELL, F .
GERONTOLOGIST, 1984, 24 (01) :77-83
[5]   PROFITS AND PATIENT-CARE QUALITY IN NURSING-HOMES - ARE THEY COMPATIBLE [J].
FOTTLER, MD ;
SMITH, HL ;
JAMES, WL .
GERONTOLOGIST, 1981, 21 (05) :532-538
[6]  
GREENE VL, 1981, PUBLIC POLICY, V29, P399
[7]  
GUSTAFSON DH, 1990, HEALTH SERV RES, V25, P97
[8]  
GUSTAFSON DH, 1980, PUBLIC HLTH REP, V954, P336
[9]  
HARRINGTON C, 1990, J AGING SOC POLICY, V3, P127
[10]  
HARRINGTON C, 1996, NURSING FACILITIES S