A quantitative assessment of an outsourced agricultural extension service in the Umzimkhulu District of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa

被引:6
作者
Lyne, Michael C. [1 ,2 ]
Jonas, Nomonde [3 ]
Ortmann, Gerald F. [3 ]
机构
[1] Lincoln Univ, Fac Agribusiness & Commerce, Dept Agribusiness & Markets, POB 85084, Lincoln 7647, New Zealand
[2] Univ KwaZulu Natal, Sch Agr Earth & Environm Sci, Private Bag X01, ZA-3209 Scottsville, South Africa
[3] Univ KwaZulu Natal, Sch Agr Earth & Environm Sci, Agr Econ, Scottsville, South Africa
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Agricultural extension; smallholders; impact assessment; program evaluation; South Africa; Lima rural development foundation; FARMER FIELD SCHOOLS; INSTRUMENTAL VARIABLES; PROPENSITY-SCORE; IMPACT; POVERTY; PRODUCTIVITY; PROJECTS; RETURNS; PROGRAM; AREAS;
D O I
10.1080/1389224X.2017.1387159
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Purpose: This study evaluates the impact of an outsourced extension service delivered by Lima Rural Development Foundation (Lima) in the Umzimkhulu district of South Africa. The evaluation is conducted at both the household and program levels. Design/methodology/approach: Household impacts were estimated using two-stage regression with instrumental variables to account for selection bias. Gains in household income were extrapolated to estimate the net incremental benefit of the program and its financial return at district level. These analyses were underpinned by a rigorous sampling design. Findings: The results show that the outsourced extension service made a significant and substantial contribution to household crop income and net income. In addition, clients perceived a range of socio-economic benefits such as better diets, improved product quality, and job creation. Analysis of the financial cost and benefit of the extension service at district level suggests an annual net incremental benefit of R5 million (US$0.4 million), and a 95% probability that returns to the service exceeded 20% in 2012/2013. Practical implications: These results suggest that there is good reason for donors to continue funding effective extension services to small farmers in areas of high agricultural potential. Theoretical implications: This is an empirical study. It uses well-established methods to measure the impact but introduces a local economy multiplier to capture some of the indirect effects of agricultural extension. Originality/value: This research is valuable as very few studies worldwide have evaluated the impact of agricultural extension services at both the farm and program levels.
引用
收藏
页码:51 / 64
页数:14
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
Alage A., 2010, Towards Improving Agricultural Extension Service Delivery in the SADC Region. Proceedings of the Workshop on Information Sharing among Extension Players in the SADC Region, P26
[2]  
Angrist JD, 1996, J AM STAT ASSOC, V91, P444, DOI 10.2307/2291629
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2010, HDB IMPACT EVALUATIO
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2008, OVEWP0508
[5]   Returns to spending on agricultural extension: the case of the National Agricultural Advisory Services (NAADS) program of Uganda [J].
Benin, Samuel ;
Nkonya, Ephraim ;
Okecho, Geresom ;
Randriamamonjy, Jose ;
Kato, Edward ;
Lubade, Geofrey ;
Kyotalimye, Miriam .
AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2011, 42 (02) :249-267
[6]   THE ECONOMIC-IMPACT OF AGRICULTURAL EXTENSION - A REVIEW [J].
BIRKHAEUSER, D ;
EVENSON, RE ;
FEDER, G .
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND CULTURAL CHANGE, 1991, 39 (03) :607-650
[7]   The Economic Impact of Marena's Investments on Sustainable Agricultural Systems in Honduras [J].
Bravo-Ureta, Boris E. ;
Almeida, Alexandre Nunes ;
Solis, Daniel ;
Inestroza, Aaron .
JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2011, 62 (02) :429-448
[8]   How do Agricultural Programmes Alter Crop Production? Evidence from Ecuador [J].
Cavatassi, Romina ;
Salazar, Lina ;
Gonzalez-Flores, Mario ;
Winters, Paul .
JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2011, 62 (02) :403-428
[9]   Practical challenges and strategies for randomised control trials in agricultural extension and other development programmes [J].
Culbertson, Michael J. ;
McCole, Daniel ;
McNamara, Paul E. .
JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT EFFECTIVENESS, 2014, 6 (03) :284-299
[10]   Impact of Farmer Field Schools on Agricultural Productivity and Poverty in East Africa [J].
Davis, K. ;
Nkonya, E. ;
Kato, E. ;
Mekonnen, D. A. ;
Odendo, M. ;
Miiro, R. ;
Nkuba, J. .
WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2012, 40 (02) :402-413