Nonparametric measures of the impact of public research expenditures on Australian broadacre agriculture

被引:7
作者
Cox, T
Mullen, J
Hu, WS
机构
[1] Dept. of Agric. and Appl. Economics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI
关键词
D O I
10.1111/1467-8489.00017
中图分类号
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号
0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;
摘要
Nonparametric methods are used to measure the impact of public research expenditures on Australian broadacre agriculture over the 1953-94 period. Results using both unrestricted and 30-year lagged specifications of the research impacts on productivity suggest that while certain aspects of the nonparametric multi-input/output technologies are quite robust to alternative specifications (in particular, the associated Malmquist total factor productivity indexes), other aspects are less stable (in particular, the indexes on input and, to a lesser extent, output biased technical change). Internal rates of return to research expenditures on Australian broadacre agriculture are estimated to be in the 12 per cent to 20 per cent range.
引用
收藏
页码:333 / 360
页数:28
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
Afriat SN., 1972, INT ECON REV, V13, P5, DOI [DOI 10.2307/2525845, 10.2307/2525845]
[2]  
ALSTON JM, 1993, WP933 U MINN CTR INT
[3]  
ALSTON JM, 1995, OFF TECHN ASS WASH D
[4]  
ALSTON JM, 1994, SCI SCARCITY PRINCIP
[5]   NONPARAMETRIC ANALYSIS OF TECHNICAL AND ALLOCATIVE EFFICIENCIES IN PRODUCTION [J].
BANKER, RD ;
MAINDIRATTA, A .
ECONOMETRICA, 1988, 56 (06) :1315-1332
[6]  
BECK AC, 1985, 55 AUSTR NZ ASS AGR
[7]   THE ECONOMIC-THEORY OF INDEX NUMBERS AND THE MEASUREMENT OF INPUT, OUTPUT, AND PRODUCTIVITY [J].
CAVES, DW ;
CHRISTENSEN, LR ;
DIEWERT, WE .
ECONOMETRICA, 1982, 50 (06) :1393-1414
[8]  
CHALFANT JA, 1994, UNPUB VARIATIONS INV
[9]   PRIMAL-DUAL APPROACH TO NONPARAMETRIC PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS - THE CASE OF US AGRICULTURE [J].
CHAVAS, JP ;
COX, TL .
JOURNAL OF PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS, 1994, 5 (04) :359-373
[10]   An analysis of the source and nature of technical change: The case of US agriculture [J].
Chavas, JP ;
Aliber, M ;
Cox, TL .
REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 1997, 79 (03) :482-492