Who has been caring for the baby?

被引:116
作者
Darmstadt, Gary L. [1 ]
Kinney, Mary V. [2 ]
Chopra, Mickey [3 ]
Cousens, Simon [4 ,5 ]
Kak, Lily [6 ]
Paul, Vinod K. [7 ]
Martines, Jose [8 ,9 ]
Bhutta, Zulfiqar A. [10 ,11 ]
Lawn, Joy E. [2 ,4 ,5 ,12 ]
机构
[1] Bill & Melinda Gates Fdn, Global Dev Div, Seattle, WA 98102 USA
[2] Save Children, Saving Newborn Lives, Cape Town, South Africa
[3] UNICEF, New York, NY USA
[4] London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, Fac Epidemiol & Populat Hlth, London WC1, England
[5] London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, Ctr Maternal Reprod & Child Hlth, London WC1, England
[6] US Agcy Int Dev, Washington, DC 20523 USA
[7] All India Inst Med Sci, New Delhi, India
[8] WHO, Dept Maternal Newborn Child & Adolescent Hlth, CH-1211 Geneva, Switzerland
[9] Univ Bergen, Ctr Int Hlth, Ctr Intervent Sci Maternal & Child Hlth, Bergen, Norway
[10] Hosp Sick Children, Ctr Global Child Hlth, Toronto, ON M5G 1X8, Canada
[11] Aga Khan Univ, Ctr Excellence Women & Child Hlth, Karachi, Pakistan
[12] Dept Int Dev, Res & Evidence Div, London, England
基金
比尔及梅琳达.盖茨基金会;
关键词
NEWBORN SURVIVAL; NEONATAL SURVIVAL; CHILD HEALTH; SYSTEMATIC ANALYSIS; POLITICAL PRIORITY; GLOBAL HEALTH; DECADE; CARE; MORTALITY; STILLBIRTHS;
D O I
10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60458-X
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Nearly a decade ago, The Lancet published the Neonatal Survival Series, with an ambitious call for integration of newborn care across the continuum of reproductive, maternal, newborn, and child health and nutrition (RMNCH). In this first of five papers in the Every Newborn Series, we consider what has changed during this decade, assessing progress on the basis of a systematic policy heuristic including agenda-setting, policy formulation and adoption, leadership and partnership, implementation, and evaluation of effect. Substantial progress has been made in agenda setting and policy formulation for newborn health, as witnessed by the shift from maternal and child health to maternal, newborn, and child health as a standard. However, investment and large-scale implementation have been disappointingly small, especially in view of the size of the burden and potential for rapid change and synergies throughout the RMNCH continuum. Moreover, stillbirths remain invisible on the global health agenda. Hence that progress in improvement of newborn survival and reduction of stillbirths lags behind that of maternal mortality and deaths for children aged 1-59 months is not surprising. Faster progress is possible, but with several requirements: clear communication of the interventions with the greatest effect and how to overcome bottlenecks for scale-up; national leadership, and technical capacity to integrate and implement these interventions; global coordination of partners, especially within countries, in provision of technical assistance and increased funding; increased domestic investment in newborn health, and access to specific commodities and equipment where needed; better data to monitor progress, with local data used for programme improvement; and accountability for results at all levels, including demand from communities and mortality targets in the post-2015 framework. Who will step up during the next decade to ensure decision making in countries leads to implementation of stillbirth and newborn health interventions within RMNCH programmes?
引用
收藏
页码:174 / 188
页数:15
相关论文
共 113 条
[1]   Child Mortality Estimation: A Comparison of UN IGME and IHME Estimates of Levels and Trends in Under-Five Mortality Rates and Deaths [J].
Alkema, Leontine ;
You, Danzhen .
PLOS MEDICINE, 2012, 9 (08)
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2014, MATERNAL MORTALITY 1
[3]  
[Anonymous], GLOB PUBLIC IN PRESS
[4]  
[Anonymous], RES BAS FIN HLTH HLT
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2011, KEEP PROM MEAS RES C
[6]  
[Anonymous], EV NEWB ACT PLAN END
[7]  
[Anonymous], EV WOM EV CHILD STRE
[8]  
[Anonymous], BORN TOO SOON GLOB A
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2009, WHO UNICEF JOINT STA
[10]  
[Anonymous], GLOB FUND STRAT 2012