Response inhibition in children with DSM-IV subtypes of AD/HD and related disruptive disorders: The role of reward

被引:76
作者
Scheres, A [1 ]
Oosterlaan, J [1 ]
Sergeant, JA [1 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Dept Clin Neuropsychol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
D O I
10.1076/chin.7.3.172.8746
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
The current study had four aims: (a) to replicate previous findings of slow response inhibition in Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (AD/HD), (b) to explore whether poor response inhibition in children with AD/HD is a core problem or rather a result of an underlying problem related to reward, (c) to investigate the specificity of poor response inhibition and the role of reward in relation to AD/HD, and (d) to study whether findings would be different for three subtypes of AD/HD. In order to address these issues, a stop paradigm was administered under a reward condition and under a nonreward condition to an AD/HD group (n = 24), an Oppositional Defiant Disorder (ODD)/Conduct Disorder (CD) group (n = 21), a comorbid AD/HD + ODD/CD group (n = 27), and a normal control (NC) group (n = 41). Firstly, contrary to prediction, none of the Disruptive Behavior Disorder (DBD) groups differed from the NC group with respect to the speed of the inhibition process. Secondly, it was shown that children with AD/HD and children with comorbid AD/HD + ODD/CD, but not children with ODD/CD alone, slowed down more dramatically in the reward condition than normal controls. This finding was interpreted as a strategy to increase the chance of being rewarded in children with AD/HD and children with comorbid AD/HD + ODD/CD, but not in children with pure ODD/CD. Finally, analysis of AD/HD subtypes did not change the main findings of this study.
引用
收藏
页码:172 / 189
页数:18
相关论文
共 76 条
[1]  
Achenbach T., 1991, Manual for the youth self-report and 1991 profile
[2]  
Achenbach T.M., 1991, INTEGRATIVE GUIDE 19
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2000, VRAGENLIJST GEDRAGSP
[4]   Inhibitory motor control in stop paradigms: review and reinterpretation of neural mechanisms [J].
Band, GPH ;
van Boxtel, GJM .
ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 1999, 101 (2-3) :179-211
[5]  
BAND GPH, 1997, THESIS U AMSTERDAM
[6]   FRONTAL-LOBE FUNCTIONS IN ATTENTION-DEFICIT DISORDER WITH AND WITHOUT HYPERACTIVITY - A REVIEW AND RESEARCH REPORT [J].
BARKLEY, RA ;
GRODZINSKY, G ;
DUPAUL, GJ .
JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL CHILD PSYCHOLOGY, 1992, 20 (02) :163-188
[7]   Behavioral inhibition, sustained attention, and executive functions: Constructing a unifying theory of ADHD [J].
Barkley, RA .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1997, 121 (01) :65-94
[8]   AUTOMATIC AND EFFORTFUL PROCESSING IN ATTENTION DEFICIT HYPERACTIVITY DISORDER [J].
BORCHERDING, B ;
THOMPSON, K ;
KRUESI, M ;
BARTKO, J ;
RAPOPORT, JL ;
WEINGARTNER, H .
JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL CHILD PSYCHOLOGY, 1988, 16 (03) :333-345
[9]   Neuroelectric mapping reveals precursor of stop failures in children with attention deficits [J].
Brandeis, D ;
van Leeuwen, TH ;
Rubia, K ;
Vitacco, D ;
Steger, J ;
Pascual-Marqui, RD ;
Steinhausen, HC .
BEHAVIOURAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 1998, 94 (01) :111-125
[10]  
Carlson CL, 1999, MENT RETARD DEV D R, V5, P199, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2779(1999)5:3<199::AID-MRDD6>3.0.CO