Quantifying the water vapour feedback associated with post-Pinatubo global cooling

被引:42
作者
Forster, PMD
Collins, M
机构
[1] NOAA, Aeron Lab, Boulder, CO 80303 USA
[2] Univ Reading, Dept Meteorol, Ctr Global Atmospher Modelling, Reading, Berks, England
关键词
D O I
10.1007/s00382-004-0431-z
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
There is an ongoing important debate about the role of water vapour in climate change. Predictions of future climate change depend strongly on the magnitude of the water vapour feedback and until now models have almost exclusively been relied upon to quantify this feedback. In this work we employ observations of water vapour changes, together with detailed radiative calculations to estimate the water vapour feedback for the case of the Mt. Pinatubo eruption. We then compare our observed estimate with that calculated from a relatively large ensemble of simulations from a complex coupled climate model. We calculate an observed water vapour feedback parameter of -1.6 Wm(-2) K-1, with uncertainty placing the feedback parameter between -0.9 to -2.5 Wm(-2) K-1. The uncertain is principally from natural climate variations that contaminate the volcanic cooling. The observed estimates are consistent with that found in the climate model, with the ensemble average model feedback parameter being -2.0 Wm(-2) K-1, with a 5-95% range of -0.4 to -3.6 Wm(-2) K-1 (as in the case of the observations, the spread is due to an inability to separate the forced response from natural variability). However, in both the upper troposphere and Southern Hemisphere the observed model water vapour response differs markedly from the observations. The observed range represents a 40%-400% increase in the magnitude of surface temperature change when compared to a fixed water vapour response and is in good agreement with values found in other studies. Variability, both in the observed value and in the climate model's feedback parameter, between different ensemble members, suggests that the long-term water vapour feedback associated with global climate change could still be a factor of 2 or 3 different than the mean observed value found here and the model water vapour feedback could be quite different from this value; although a small water vapour feedback appears unlikely. We also discuss where in the atmosphere water vapour changes have their largest effect on surface climate.
引用
收藏
页码:207 / 214
页数:8
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [1] Allan RP, 1999, Q J ROY METEOR SOC, V125, P2103, DOI 10.1002/qj.49712555809
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1990, IPCC 1 ASS REP POL S
  • [3] OBSERVED DEPENDENCE OF THE WATER-VAPOR AND CLEAR-SKY GREENHOUSE-EFFECT ON SEA-SURFACE TEMPERATURE - COMPARISON WITH CLIMATE WARMING EXPERIMENTS
    BONY, S
    DUVEL, JP
    LETREUT, H
    [J]. CLIMATE DYNAMICS, 1995, 11 (05) : 307 - 320
  • [4] INTERCOMPARISON AND INTERPRETATION OF CLIMATE FEEDBACK PROCESSES IN 19 ATMOSPHERIC GENERAL-CIRCULATION MODELS
    CESS, RD
    POTTER, GL
    BLANCHET, JP
    BOER, GJ
    DELGENIO, AD
    DEQUE, M
    DYMNIKOV, V
    GALIN, V
    GATES, WL
    GHAN, SJ
    KIEHL, JT
    LACIS, AA
    LETREUT, H
    LI, ZX
    LIANG, XZ
    MCAVANEY, BJ
    MELESHKO, VP
    MITCHELL, JFB
    MORCRETTE, JJ
    RANDALL, DA
    RIKUS, L
    ROECKNER, E
    ROYER, JF
    SCHLESE, U
    SHEININ, DA
    SLINGO, A
    SOKOLOV, AP
    TAYLOR, KE
    WASHINGTON, WM
    WETHERALD, RT
    YAGAI, I
    ZHANG, MH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1990, 95 (D10) : 16601 - 16615
  • [5] Cloud feedback in atmospheric general circulation models: An update
    Cess, RD
    Zhang, MH
    Ingram, WJ
    Potter, GL
    Alskseev, V
    Barker, HW
    Cohen-Solal, E
    Colman, RA
    Dazlich, DA
    Del Genio, AD
    Dix, MR
    Dymnikov, V
    Esch, M
    Fowler, LD
    Fraser, JR
    Galin, V
    Gates, WL
    Hack, JJ
    Kiehl, JT
    Le Treut, H
    Lo, KKW
    McAvaney, BJ
    Meleshko, VP
    Morcrette, JJ
    Randall, DA
    Roeckner, E
    Royer, JF
    Schlesinger, ME
    Sporyshev, PV
    Timbal, B
    Volodin, EM
    Taylor, KE
    Wang, W
    Wetherald, RT
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1996, 101 (D8) : 12791 - 12794
  • [6] The internal climate variability of HadCM3, a version of the Hadley Centre coupled model without flux adjustments
    Collins, M
    Tett, SFB
    Cooper, C
    [J]. CLIMATE DYNAMICS, 2001, 17 (01) : 61 - 81
  • [7] COLLINS M, 2003, IN PRESS AGU MONOGRA
  • [8] On the vertical extent of atmospheric feedbacks
    Colman, RA
    [J]. CLIMATE DYNAMICS, 2001, 17 (5-6) : 391 - 405
  • [9] An examination of climate sensitivity for idealised climate change experiments in an intermediate general circulation model
    Forster, PM
    Blackburn, M
    Glover, R
    Shine, KP
    [J]. CLIMATE DYNAMICS, 2000, 16 (10-11) : 833 - 849
  • [10] Radiative forcing and temperature trends from stratospheric ozone changes
    Forster, PMD
    Shine, KP
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1997, 102 (D9) : 10841 - 10855