Impact of cautery versus cautery-free preservation of neurovascular bundles on early return of potency

被引:56
作者
Ahlering, Thomas E. [1 ]
Skarecky, Douglas [1 ]
Borin, James [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Urol, Orange, CA 92868 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1089/end.2006.20.586
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: To update our short-term potency outcomes from a cautery-free (CFT) versus bipolar cautery technique to preserve the neurovascular bundles (NVB) during robotic laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RLP). Patients and Methods: Previously, we reported on 3-month potency outcomes in 23 men, which we now extend to 51 men. All men met three criteria: age < 66 years, Sexual Health Inventory in Men (SHIM-5) score of 22 to 25, and either unilateral or bilateral NVB preservation at LRP. Group I (N = 51), the study group, had preservation of the NVB with CFT. Group 2 (N = 36) had traditional dissection using bipolar cautery. The average age and preoperative SHIM scores were similar for the two groups. Data were collected prospectively via validated questionnaires. Potency was defined as an erection adequate for vaginal penetration. All men were asked to estimate the fullness of erections compared with baseline (preoperative). Results: The average age and preoperative SHIM scores were similar for both groups. The rate of potency at 3 months was 47% (24/51) in group 1 versus just 8.3% (3/36) in group 2 (P < 0.001). Additionally, only 9 of 25 CFT patients (36%) reported zero fullness compared with 15 of 22 patients (68%) in the bipolar cauterytreated group (P = 0.03). Conclusions: With expanded experience, there was no change in 3-month return of sexual function (47%) compared with our initial publication. This result further supports the importance of avoiding cautery when controlling the vascular pedicle and dissecting the NVB.
引用
收藏
页码:586 / 589
页数:4
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]   Feasibility study for robotic radical prostatectomy cautery-free neurovascular bundle preservation [J].
Ahlering, TE ;
Eichel, L ;
Chou, D ;
Skarecky, DW .
UROLOGY, 2005, 65 (05) :994-997
[2]   Early potency outcomes with cautery-free neurovascular bundle preservation with robotic laparoscopic radical prostatectomy [J].
Ahlering, TE ;
Eichel, L ;
Skarecky, D .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2005, 19 (06) :715-718
[3]  
CATALONA WJ, 1985, UROL CLIN N AM, V12, P187
[4]   Neuroprotection due to irrigation during bipolar cautery [J].
Donzelli, J ;
Leonetti, JP ;
Wurster, RD ;
Lee, JM ;
Young, MRI .
ARCHIVES OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2000, 126 (02) :149-153
[5]   Lateral pedicle control during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Refined technique [J].
Gill, IS ;
Ukimura, O ;
Rubinstein, M ;
Finelli, A ;
Moinzadeh, A ;
Singh, D ;
Kaouk, J ;
Miki, T ;
Desai, M .
UROLOGY, 2005, 65 (01) :23-27
[6]  
Guillonneau B, 2000, J UROLOGY, V163, P1643, DOI 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)67512-X
[7]   Patient reported sexual function following laparoscopic radical prostatectomy [J].
Katz, R ;
Salomon, L ;
Hoznek, A ;
de la Taille, A ;
Vordos, D ;
Cicco, A ;
Chopin, D ;
Abbou, CC .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2002, 168 (05) :2078-2082
[8]   Advances in nerve sparing for radical prostatectomy [J].
Klotz, L .
UROLOGY, 1999, 54 (06) :956-959
[9]   ALTERNATIVE METHOD OF NERVE-SPARING WHEN PERFORMING RADICAL RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMY [J].
KURSH, ED ;
BODNER, DR .
UROLOGY, 1988, 32 (03) :205-209
[10]  
Ong AM, 2004, J UROLOGY, V172, P1318, DOI 10.1097/01.ju.0000139883.08934.86