The female sexual distress scale (FSDS): Initial validation of a standardized scale for assessment of sexually related personal distress in women

被引:597
作者
Derogatis, LR
Rosen, R
Leiblum, S
Burnett, A
Heiman, J
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
[2] Univ Med & Dent New Jersey, Robert Wood Johnson Med Sch, Piscataway, NJ 08854 USA
[3] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Baltimore, MD 21218 USA
[4] Univ Washington, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1080/00926230290001448
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Recent consensus-based characterizations of female sexual dysfunction have emphasized personal distress as an essential component of their definition, To assist researchers and clinicians, we developed a new scale, the Female Sexual Distress Scale, to measure sexually related personal distress in women. In this article, we describe the initial stages in the development and validation of this instrument. Three studies involving a total of approximately 500 women were performed to evaluate the reliability and validity of the scale in different samples of sexually functional and dysfunctional women. Results indicated a unidimensional factor-structure in both the original 20-item version and in a "polished" 12-item version. We observed a high degree of internal consistency and test-retest reliability in both versions across all three studies. Additionally, the scale showed a high degree of discriminative ability to distinguish between sexually, dysfunctional and,functional women in each of the studies. One study also showed a strong sensitivity, to treatment response. Finally, we observed moderate positive correlations with other conceptually related nonsexual measures of distress, supporting the construct validity, of the scale. Overall, these findings provide solid support for the FSDS as a valid and reliable measure for assessing sexually, related personal distress in women.
引用
收藏
页码:317 / 330
页数:14
相关论文
共 12 条
  • [1] Report of the international consensus development conference on female sexual dysfunction: Definitions and classifications
    Basson, R
    Berman, J
    Burnett, A
    Derogatis, L
    Ferguson, D
    Fourcroy, J
    Goldstein, I
    Graziottin, A
    Heiman, J
    Laan, E
    Leiblum, S
    Padma-Nathan, H
    Rosen, R
    Segraves, K
    Segraves, RT
    Shabsigh, R
    Sipski, M
    Wagner, G
    Whipple, B
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2000, 163 (03) : 888 - 893
  • [2] AN INVENTORY FOR MEASURING DEPRESSION
    BECK, AT
    ERBAUGH, J
    WARD, CH
    MOCK, J
    MENDELSOHN, M
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY, 1961, 4 (06) : 561 - &
  • [3] Derogatis L R, 2001, J Gend Specif Med, V4, P35
  • [4] Derogatis L. R, 2000, BSI18
  • [5] Derogatis L. R, 1996, DEROGATIS AFFECTS BA
  • [6] Derogatis LR, 1998, INT J IMPOT RES, V10, pS13
  • [7] *FOOD DRUG ADM, 2000, GUID IND FEM SEX DYS
  • [8] VALIDITY OF PSYCHOLOGICAL-ASSESSMENT - VALIDATION OF INFERENCES FROM PERSONS RESPONSES AND PERFORMANCES AS SCIENTIFIC INQUIRY INTO SCORE MEANING
    MESSICK, S
    [J]. AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1995, 50 (09) : 741 - 749
  • [9] Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
    Mittal, Vijay A.
    Walker, Elaine F.
    [J]. PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH, 2011, 189 (01) : 158 - 159
  • [10] Nunnally J. C., 1978, Psychometric Theory, V2