Phylogeny of the genus Lotus (Leguminosae, Loteae):: evidence from nrITS sequences and morphology

被引:55
作者
Degtjareva, G. V.
Kramina, T. E.
Sokoloff, D. D. [1 ]
Samigullin, T. H.
Valiejo-Roman, C. M.
Antonov, A. S.
机构
[1] Moscow MV Lomonosov State Univ, Higher Plants Dept, Fac Biol, Moscow 119992, Russia
[2] Moscow MV Lomonosov State Univ, Fac Bioengn & Bioinformat, Moscow 119992, Russia
[3] Moscow MV Lomonosov State Univ, AN Belozersky Inst, Dept Evolutionary Biochem, Moscow 119992, Russia
来源
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE BOTANIQUE | 2006年 / 84卷 / 05期
关键词
Leguminosae; Loteae; Lotus; nuclear ribosomal ITS sequences; morphology;
D O I
10.1139/B06-035
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Lotus (120-130 species) is the largest genus of the tribe Loteae. The taxonomy of Lotus is complicated, and a comprehensive taxonomic revision of the genus is needed. We have conducted phylogenetic analyses of Lotus based on nrITS data alone and combined with data on 46 morphological characters. Eighty-one ingroup nrITS accessions representing 71 Lotus species are studied; among them 47 accessions representing 40 species are new. Representatives of all other genera of the tribe Loteae are included in the outgroup (for three genera, nrITS sequences are published for the first time). Forty-two of 71 ingroup species were not included in previous morphological phylogenetic studies. The most important conclusions of the present study are (1) addition of morphological data to the nrITS matrix produces a better resolved phylogeny of Lotus; (2) previous findings that Dorycnium and Tetragonolobus cannot be separated from Lotus at the generic level are well supported; (3) Lotusacreticus should be placed in section Pedrosia rather than in section Lotea; (4) a broad treatment of section Ononidium is unnatural and the section should possibly not be recognized at all; (5) section Heinekenia is paraphyletic; (6)asection Lotus should include Lotusaconimbricensis; then the section is monophyletic; (7) a basic chromosome number of xa= 6 is an important synapomorphy for the expanded section Lotus; (8) the segregation of Lotusaschimperi and allies into section Chamaelotus is well supported; (9) there is an apparent functional correlation between stylodium and keel evolution in Lotus.
引用
收藏
页码:813 / 830
页数:18
相关论文
共 93 条
[1]  
Ali S. I., 2001, Kew Bulletin, V56, P721, DOI 10.2307/4117701
[2]  
Allan G.J., 2003, Advances in Legume Systematics, P371
[3]   Tribal delimitation and phylogenetic relationships of Loteae and Coronilleae (Faboideae: Fabaceae) with special reference to Lotus:: Evidence from nuclear ribosomal ITS sequences [J].
Allan, GJ ;
Porter, JM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 2000, 87 (12) :1871-1881
[4]   Molecular phylogenetic evidence for the geographic origin and classification of Canary Island Lotus (Fabaceae: Loteae) [J].
Allan, GJ ;
Francisco-Ortega, J ;
Santos-Guerra, A ;
Boerner, E ;
Zimmer, EA .
MOLECULAR PHYLOGENETICS AND EVOLUTION, 2004, 32 (01) :123-138
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1990, PCR PROTOCOLS, DOI DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-372180-8.50042-1
[6]  
[Anonymous], LAGASCALIA
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1979, PRINCIPLES POLLINATI
[8]  
Arambarri AM, 2000, CLADISTICS, V16, P283, DOI 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2000.tb00284.x
[9]   Taxonomy of the New World species of Lotus (Leguminosae: Loteae) [J].
Arambarri, AM ;
Stenglein, SA ;
Colares, MN ;
Novoa, MC .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 2005, 53 (08) :797-812
[10]   Cladistic analysis of the Old World species of Lotus L. (Fabaceae: Loteae) [J].
Arambarri, Ana M. .
Canadian Journal of Botany, 2000, 78 (03) :351-360