The use of tomography for dental implant planning

被引:38
作者
Ekestubbe, A
Grondahl, K
Grondahl, HG
机构
[1] Dept. of Oral Diagnostic Radiology, Faculty of Odontology, Göteborg University, Gothenburg
[2] Dept. of Oral Diagnostic Radiology, Faculty of Odontology, S-413 90 Gothenburg
关键词
tomography; X-ray; X-ray computed; dental implantation;
D O I
10.1038/sj.dmfr.4600249
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives: To examine the use of tomography for dental implant planning. Methods: A questionnaire was sent to oral radiology clinics in Sweden and to implantology clinics in different parts of the world with questions on selection criteria and techniques for, and frequency of, pre-implant tomography. Differences between mean values were assessed by t-test. A new method developed by the Swedish Radiation Protection Institute was used to assess radiation absorbed dose from CT. Results: Tomography was used by 93.4% of the clinics, but there was marked variation both between and within different clinical situations. It was performed in all cases by 21% and the majority used it for the evaluation of the maxilla, the posterior mandible and in single implant cases. Small clinics (<100 patients per year) used tomography frequently and clinics in Sweden significantly more often than those in other countries. The majority had changed their policy recently, using tomography more often. CT was used by 73% of respondents, mainly the small clinics. The majority of the large clinics (>500 patients per year) used conventional tomography. The mean absorbed dose for CT scanning protocols was 65 mGy. The variation within and between different makes of CT was considerable. Conclusions: There are large variations in frequency of use of both conventional and computed tomography for dental implant planning by different clinics who also vary in the indications for their choice. A substantial factor influencing the technique chosen was its availability rather than clinical need.
引用
收藏
页码:206 / 213
页数:8
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
Abrahams J J, 1992, ORAL MAXILLOFAC SURG, V4, P1
[2]   CT-SCANNING IN THE PREOPERATIVE PLANNING OF OSSEOINTEGRATED IMPLANTS IN THE MAXILLA [J].
ANDERSSON, JE ;
SVARTZ, K .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1988, 17 (01) :33-35
[3]  
Branemark P.I., 1985, TISSUE INTEGRATED PR
[4]  
Bruggenkate CM, 1993, INT J ORAL MAXILLOF, V8, P329
[5]  
CASSELMAN JW, 1988, J HEAD NECK PATHOL, V7, P255
[6]   FREQUENCY-DOMAIN ANALYSIS OF CROSS-SECTIONAL IMAGES OF THE POSTERIOR MANDIBLE [J].
CHEN, SK ;
HOLLENDER, L .
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTICS, 1994, 77 (03) :290-295
[7]  
CLARK D E, 1990, Journal of Oral Implantology, V16, P156
[8]   AVERAGE RADIATION-DOSE IN STANDARD CT EXAMINATIONS OF THE HEAD - RESULTS OF THE 1990 NEXT SURVEY [J].
CONWAY, BJ ;
MCCROHAN, JL ;
ANTONSEN, RG ;
RUETER, FG ;
SLAYTON, RJ ;
SULEIMAN, OH .
RADIOLOGY, 1992, 184 (01) :135-140
[9]   A COMPARISON OF COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY PRACTICE IN 1989 AND 1991 [J].
CRAWLEY, MT ;
ROGERS, AT .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1994, 67 (801) :872-876
[10]   LOW-DOSE CT AND INFLAMMATORY DISEASE OF THE PARANASAL SINUSES [J].
DUVOISIN, B ;
LANDRY, M ;
CHAPUIS, L ;
KRAYENBUHL, M ;
SCHNYDER, P .
NEURORADIOLOGY, 1991, 33 (05) :403-406