Experimental tooth movement through mature and immature bone regenerates after distraction osteogenesis in dogs

被引:42
作者
Nakamoto, N
Nagasaka, H
Daimaruya, T
Takahashi, I
Sugawara, J
Mitani, H
机构
[1] Tohoku Univ, Grad Sch Dent, Div Orthodont, Sendai, Miyagi 980, Japan
[2] Tohoku Univ, Grad Sch Dent, Div Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Sendai, Miyagi 980, Japan
关键词
D O I
10.1067/mod.2002.122368
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was to verify the influence of tooth movement on tooth roots and periodontal tissues when teeth were moved into mature, well-organized, and mineralized regenerate bone created after distraction osteogenesis compared with immature, fibrous, and less-mineralized bone. Six 15-month-old male beagles underwent 10 mm of bilateral mandibular distraction osteogenesis. After 2-week (group 1) and 12-week (group 2) consolidation periods, third premolars were moved distally into the regenerate bone with 100 g of orthodontic force for 12 weeks. Simultaneously, second premolars were also moved distally as controls. After completion of tooth movement, the experimental animals were killed, and their tissues were harvested for histological evaluation. When premolars in groups 1 and 2 were compared, group 1 showed higher rates of tooth movement until the eighth week of experimental tooth movement (P<.05). The amount of tooth movement was significantly greater in group 1 than in group 2 or in the control teeth (P<.05). In group 1, we observed considerable root resorption extending into the dentin, and the thickness of the dentin became approximately half that of the controls at the compression side adjacent to the distraction gap, This root resorption extended from the cementoenamel junction to the root apex. In group 2, root resorption on the compression side reached the dentin, but the root resorption was less than in group 1. These results indicated that heavy force and early orthodontic tooth movement are not recommended when teeth are moved through regenerated bone created by distraction osteogenesis, to avoid tipping and severe root resorption.
引用
收藏
页码:385 / 395
页数:11
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
ALONSO JE, 1991, CLIN PLAST SURG, V18, P497
[2]  
ARONSON J, 1989, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P71
[3]   Intraoral widening and lengthening of the mandible in baboons by distraction osteogenesis [J].
Bell, WH ;
Gonzalez, M ;
Samchukov, ML ;
Guerrero, CA .
JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1999, 57 (05) :548-562
[4]  
Carter DR, 1998, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, pS41
[5]   Growth factor and cytokine gene expression in mechanically strained human osteoblast-like cells: Implications for distraction osteogenesis [J].
Cillo, JE ;
Gassner, R ;
Koepsel, RR ;
Buckley, MJ .
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTOLOGY, 2000, 90 (02) :147-154
[6]  
Claes LE, 1998, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, pS132
[7]   Mandibular distraction osteogenesis: A historic perspective and future directions [J].
Cope, JB ;
Samchukov, ML ;
Cherkashin, AM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1999, 115 (04) :448-460
[8]  
Cope JB, 2000, ANGLE ORTHOD, V70, P99
[9]   Experimental tooth movement through regenerate alveolar bone: A pilot study [J].
Cope, JB ;
Harper, RP ;
Samchukov, ML .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1999, 116 (05) :501-505
[10]   Muscle regeneration and fiber-type transformation during distraction osteogenesis [J].
De Deyne, PG ;
Hayatsu, K ;
Meyer, R ;
Paley, D ;
Herzenberg, JE .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH, 1999, 17 (04) :560-570