The performance of pixel window algorithms in the classification of habitats using VHSR imagery

被引:19
作者
Keramitsoglou, Iphigenia
Sarimveis, Haralambos
Kiranoudis, Chris T.
Kontoes, Charalambos
Sifakis, Nicolaos
Fitoka, Eleni
机构
[1] Univ Athens, Dept Appl Phys, Remote Sensing & Image Proc Team, GR-15784 Athens, Greece
[2] Natl Tech Univ Athens, Sch Chem Engn, GR-15780 Athens, Greece
[3] Natl Observ Athens, Inst Space Applicat & Remote Sensing, GR-15236 Athens, Greece
[4] Greek Biotope Wetland Ctr, Goulandris Nat Hist Museum, Thessaloniki 57001, Greece
关键词
habitat classification; RBF neural networks; kernel based re-classification; support vector machines; EUNIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2006.01.002
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
This study investigates the potential of three advanced pixel window classification methods for habitat mapping, namely Kernel based spatial Re-Classification (KRC), Radial Basis Function (RBF) neural networks (NN) and Support Vector Machines (SVM). KRC classifier takes into account the spatial arrangement and frequency of spectral classes present within a predefined square kernel. On the other hand, RBF-NN and SVM classifiers use a set of spectral parameters (digital numbers of training pixels, mean values and standard deviations within a specified window kernel) as input information. The fuzzy means clustering algorithm is utilized for training the RBF networks. This method is based on a fuzzy partition of the input space and requires only a short amount of time to determine both the structure and the parameters of the RBF-NN classifier. The radial basis function is also adopted as the kernel function in the implementation of the SVM methodology. The test area of the present study is Lake Kerkini, a wetland ecosystem located in Macedonia (Northern Greece). The methods are applied to a very high spatial resolution multispectral satellite image acquired by IKONOS-2. The nomenclature used is EUNIS, a detailed hierarchical habitat classification scheme. Several classification experiments are carried out using the same training samples in order to study the behaviour of the three classifiers and perform meaningful comparisons. Overall, all three classifiers performed satisfactorily; however the SVM and RBF-NN classifiers consistently outperformed KRC, reaching overall accuracies of 72% and 69%, respectively. (C) 2006 International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Inc. (ISPRS). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:225 / 238
页数:14
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   Classification of ASAS multiangle and multispectral measurements using artificial neural networks [J].
Abuelgasim, AA ;
Gopal, S ;
Irons, JR ;
Strahler, AH .
REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 1996, 57 (02) :79-87
[2]  
[Anonymous], EUNIS HAB CLASS WEB
[3]  
[Anonymous], INT JOINT C NEUR NET
[4]  
Barnsley MJ, 1996, PHOTOGRAMM ENG REM S, V62, P949
[5]  
Bock Michael, 2003, Journal for Nature Conservation (Jena), V11, P145, DOI 10.1016/S1617-1381(04)70045-X
[6]   Kernel-based methods for hyperspectral image classification [J].
Camps-Valls, G ;
Bruzzone, L .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2005, 43 (06) :1351-1362
[7]   LIBSVM: A Library for Support Vector Machines [J].
Chang, Chih-Chung ;
Lin, Chih-Jen .
ACM TRANSACTIONS ON INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS AND TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 2 (03)
[8]  
Cherkassky V, 1997, IEEE Trans Neural Netw, V8, P1564, DOI 10.1109/TNN.1997.641482
[9]  
CHETTRI SR, 1992, NASA 1992 GODD C SPA, P137
[10]  
Decatur S. E., 1989, IJCNN: International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (Cat. No.89CH2765-6), P283, DOI 10.1109/IJCNN.1989.118592