Sensory and instrumental relationships of texture of cooked rice from selected cultivars and postharvest handling practices

被引:75
作者
Lyon, BG
Champagne, ET
Vinyard, BT
Windham, WR
机构
[1] USDA ARS, Richard B Russell Agr Res Ctr, Athens, GA 30604 USA
[2] USDA ARS, So Reg Res Ctr, New Orleans, LA 70124 USA
[3] USDA ARS, Biometr Consulting Serv, Beltsville, MD 20705 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1094/CCHEM.2000.77.1.64
中图分类号
O69 [应用化学];
学科分类号
081704 ;
摘要
Measurement of cooked rice texture attributes by sensory and instrumental methods is important because of the increased popularity of rice and rice products by globally diverse cultures. Many factors influence cooked rice texture, including cultivar, physicochemical properties, postharvest handling practices (milling degree, drying conditions, and final moisture), and cooking method. Information on the relationships between sensory, physical, and chemical characteristics will lead to better methods to quickly evaluate and predict end-use qualities, which will help to match rices with specific characteristics to populations that demand those attributes. This article reports the relationships between two modes of measuring texture attributes of rices: sensory and instrumental texture analyzers. Six medium- and short-grain rice samples differing by cultivar or growing location were dried to achieve final moisture levels of 12 or 15% and then regular- or deep-milled (n = 120). Correlations between individual sensory descriptive attributes and instrumental texture profile parameters were weak. Of only 12 significant correlations, the highest value was r = 0.624. Combined sensory and instrumental data were factor-analyzed, This analysis revealed that sensory attributes still accounted for the most variation (35.32% out of 76.55%). Sensory descriptive analysis was more sensitive to subtle changes in initial texture perception including parameters relating to stickiness and adhesiveness. The two-cycle compression test for texture profile parameters (i.e., hardness, cohesiveness, adhesiveness, gumminess, springiness, and chewiness) accounted for less variation in the data on texture differences.
引用
收藏
页码:64 / 69
页数:6
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
*AOAC, 1990, ASS OFF AN CHEM OFF
[2]   Effects of postharvest processing on texture profile analysis of cooked rice [J].
Champagne, ET ;
Lyon, BG ;
Min, BK ;
Vinyard, BT ;
Bett, KL ;
Barton, FE ;
Webb, BD ;
McClung, AM ;
Moldenhauer, KA ;
Linscombe, S ;
McKenzie, KS ;
Kohlwey, DE .
CEREAL CHEMISTRY, 1998, 75 (02) :181-186
[3]   Effects of drying conditions, final moisture content, and degree of milling on rice flavor [J].
Champagne, ET ;
Bett, KL ;
Vinyard, BT ;
Webb, BD ;
McClung, AM ;
Barton, FE ;
Lyon, BG ;
Moldenhauer, K ;
Linscombe, S ;
Kohlwey, D .
CEREAL CHEMISTRY, 1997, 74 (05) :566-570
[4]  
CIVILLE G V, 1975, Journal of Texture Studies, V6, P19, DOI 10.1111/j.1745-4603.1975.tb01115.x
[5]  
CIVILLE G V, 1973, Journal of Texture Studies, V4, P204, DOI 10.1111/j.1745-4603.1973.tb00665.x
[6]  
DELMUNDO AM, 1989, J TEXTURE STUD, V20, P97, DOI 10.1111/j.1745-4603.1989.tb00423.x
[7]   THE TEXTURE OF COOKED RICE [J].
DESHPANDE, SS ;
BHATTACHARYA, KR .
JOURNAL OF TEXTURE STUDIES, 1982, 13 (01) :31-42
[8]  
Hamaker B. R., 1994, RICE SCI TECHNOLOGY
[9]  
Juliano B. O., 1985, RICE CHEM TECHNOLOGY
[10]  
JULIANO BO, 1971, CEREAL SCI TODAY, V16, P334