The effects of generation on conceptual implicit memory

被引:41
作者
Mulligan, NW [1 ]
机构
[1] So Methodist Univ, Dept Psychol, Dallas, TX 75275 USA
关键词
implicit and explicit memory; generation effect; conceptual priming;
D O I
10.1016/S0749-596X(02)00006-2
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
The generation effect has been central to theoretical analyses of implicit memory and has been used as a criterion for classifying implicit tests as conceptual. The present experiments demonstrate that generation does not always enhance conceptual implicit memory. Four experiments examined the effects of generation on conceptual implicit and explicit memory in category-exemplar production and category-cued recall, respectively. Two nonsemantic generation tasks, letter transposition and word-fragment generation, affected recall but not conceptual priming, dissociating performance on the two conceptual tests. A semantic generation task, however, enhanced both recall and priming. Finally, the letter-transposition task enhanced conceptual priming when categorical information was salient at encoding (in study lists blocked by category) but not when categorical information was nonobvious (in randomly ordered study lists). These results help delineate conditions under which generation effects are obtained in conceptual priming and are discussed in terms of the item-specific-relational distinction (Hunt & McDaniel, 1993). (C) 2002 Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:327 / 342
页数:16
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2015, COGNITION EXPLORING
[2]  
BATTIG WF, 1969, J EXPT PSYCHOL MON 2, V80
[3]   THE GENERATION EFFECT IS NO ARTIFACT - GENERATING MAKES WORDS DISTINCTIVE [J].
BEGG, I ;
SNIDER, A ;
FOLEY, F ;
GODDARD, R .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 1989, 15 (05) :977-989
[4]   INVESTIGATING DISSOCIATIONS AMONG MEMORY MEASURES - SUPPORT FOR A TRANSFER-APPROPRIATE PROCESSING FRAMEWORK [J].
BLAXTON, TA .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 1989, 15 (04) :657-668
[5]   DISSOCIATIONS AMONG MEMORY MEASURES IN MEMORY-IMPAIRED SUBJECTS - EVIDENCE FOR A PROCESSING ACCOUNT OF MEMORY [J].
BLAXTON, TA .
MEMORY & COGNITION, 1992, 20 (05) :549-562
[6]   IMPLICIT MEMORY AND TEST AWARENESS [J].
BOWERS, JS ;
SCHACTER, DL .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 1990, 16 (03) :404-416
[7]   A REEVALUATION OF SEMANTIC VERSUS NONSEMANTIC PROCESSING IN IMPLICIT MEMORY [J].
BROWN, AS ;
MITCHELL, DB .
MEMORY & COGNITION, 1994, 22 (05) :533-541
[8]   On the reliability of implicit and explicit memory measures [J].
Buchner, A ;
Wippich, W .
COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 40 (03) :227-259
[9]   The item-order distinction and the generation effect: The importance of order information in long-term memory [J].
Burns, DJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 109 (04) :567-580
[10]   A DISSOCIATION BETWEEN 2 IMPLICIT CONCEPTUAL TESTS SUPPORTS THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN TYPES OF CONCEPTUAL PROCESSING [J].
CABEZA, R .
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 1994, 1 (04) :505-508