How should we rate research? The UK's current system can be improved but shouldn't be discarded

被引：12

作者：

Hobbs, FDR ^{[1
]}

Stewart, PM

机构：

[1] Univ Birmingham, Dept Primary Care & Gen Practice, Birmingham B15 2TT, W Midlands, England

[2] Univ Birmingham, Dept Med, Birmingham B15 2TT, W Midlands, England

来源：

BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL | 2006年 / 332卷 / 7548期

关键词：

D O I：

10.1136/bmj.332.7548.983

中图分类号：

R5 [内科学];

学科分类号：

1002 ; 100201 ;

摘要：

引用

页码：983 / 984

页数：2

共 10 条

[1]

[Anonymous], CLIN AC MED JEOP REC

[2]

*HERO, 2002, RES ASS EX 2001 MAN

[3]

*HIGH ED FUND COUN, 2000, BETT ACC HIGH ED REV

[4]

*HIGH ED FUND COUN, 2000, REV RES INT COMP RES

[5]

*HM TRAST, 2006, SCI INN INV FRAM 200

[6]

*RA REV, 2003, REV RES ASSESSMENT R

[7]

*RAE, 2006, PAN CRIT WORK METH

Stewart, PM .

BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2002, 324 (7335) :437-438

[9]

VANLEEUWEN TN, 2006, BIBLIOMETRIC ANAL HI

[10]

VONTIMZELMANN N, 2003, CHANGES RES ASSESSME