Complications and death after surgical treatment of small bowel obstruction - A 35-year institutional experience

被引:156
作者
Fevang, BT [1 ]
Fevang, J [1 ]
Stangeland, L [1 ]
Soreide, O [1 ]
Svanes, K [1 ]
Viste, A [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bergen, Haukeland Hosp, Dept Surg, N-5021 Bergen, Norway
关键词
D O I
10.1097/00000658-200004000-00012
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective To study factors influencing complications and death after operations for small bower obstruction (SBO) using multifactorial statistical methods. Summary Background Data Death after surgery for SBO is believed to be influenced by factors such as old age, comorbidities, bowel gangrene; and delay in treatment. No studies have been reported in which adverse factors related to death and complications have been systematically investigated with modern statistical methods. Methods The authors studied retrospectively 877 patients who underwent 1,007 operations for SBO from 1961 to 1995, Patients with paralytic ileus, intussusception, and abdominal cancer were excluded. Odds ratios for death, complications, postoperative hospital stay, and strangulation were calculated by means of logistic regression analyses. Results Death and complication rates decreased during the study period. Old age, comorbidity, nonviable strangulation, and a treatment delay of more than 24 hours were significantly associated with an increased death rate. The rate of nonviable strangulation increased markedly with patient age. Major factors increasing the complication rate were old age, comorbidity, a treatment delay of more than 24 hours, and the need for repeat surgery. Conclusion Death and complication rates after SBO decreased from 1961 to 1995. Major factors influencing the rates were age, comorbidity, nonviable strangulation, and treatment delay. Nonviable strangulation was more common in old patients.
引用
收藏
页码:529 / 537
页数:9
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
ASBUN HJ, 1989, INT SURG, V74, P23
[2]  
BENDER JS, 1989, AM SURGEON, V55, P385
[3]  
BIZER LS, 1981, SURGERY, V89, P407
[4]  
DAVIS SE, 1969, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V99, P424
[5]   SMALL BOWEL OBSTRUCTION - A REVIEW OF 264 CASES AND SUGGESTIONS FOR MANAGEMENT [J].
DEUTSCH, AA ;
EVIATAR, E ;
GUTMAN, H ;
REISS, R .
POSTGRADUATE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1989, 65 (765) :463-467
[6]   BOWEL OBSTRUCTION IN AGED PATIENT - A REVIEW OF 300 CASES [J].
GREENE, WW .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1969, 118 (04) :541-&
[7]  
HOFSTETTER SR, 1981, SURG GYNECOL OBSTET, V152, P141
[8]   REVIEW OF SMALL BOWEL OBSTRUCTION AT MILWAUKEE COUNTY GENERAL HOSPITAL [J].
LO, AM ;
EVANS, WE ;
CAREY, LC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1966, 111 (06) :884-&
[9]   CURRENT SPECTRUM OF INTESTINAL-OBSTRUCTION [J].
MCENTEE, G ;
PENDER, D ;
MULVIN, D ;
MCCULLOUGH, M ;
NAEEDER, S ;
FARAH, S ;
BADURDEEN, MS ;
FERRARO, V ;
CHAM, C ;
GILLHAM, N ;
MATTHEWS, P .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1987, 74 (11) :976-980
[10]  
MUCHA P, 1987, SURG CLIN N AM, V67, P597