Performance of the cerebral state index during increasing levels of propofol anesthesia:: A comparison with the bispectral index

被引:60
作者
Cortinez, Luis I. [1 ]
Delfino, Alejandro E. [1 ]
Fuentes, Ricardo [1 ]
Munoz, Hernan R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Pontificia Univ Catolica Chile, Fac Med, Dept Anesthesiol, Santiago, Chile
关键词
D O I
10.1213/01.ane.0000255152.96354.17
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 [麻醉学];
摘要
BACKGROUND: The cerebral state monitor is a new device to measure depth of anesthesia. In this study we compared the cerebral state monitor with the bispectral index (BIS) monitor during propofol anesthesia. METHODS: Fifteen healthy patients received a continuous infusion of propofol (300 mL/h). The cerebral state index (CSI) and the BIS values were recorded until burst suppression ratio >= 60%. Baseline variability, prediction probability, and agreement analysis between indices were evaluated. Clinical markers of loss of consciousness were also assessed. RESULTS: Mean awake BIS and CSI values were 95.6 and 91.6, respectively (P = 0.01). BIS and CSI prediction probability values (mean +/- SD) were estimated to be 0.87 +/- 0.08 and 0.86 +/- 0.08, respectively (NS). The CSI tended to stabilize at values of 60-40 when estimated propofol concentrations at the effect site increased from 5 to 8 mu g/mL. The BIS stabilized at values of 40-20 when the propofol concentrations at the effect site increased from 7 to 10 mu g/mL. The mean BIS-CSI difference was -7.4 with 95% limits of agreement of 22.2 and -36.9. The BlS and CSI correlation with the burst suppression ratio was -0.60 and -0.97, respectively (P < 0.01). Predicted BIS and CSI values for loss of eyelash reflex in 50% and 95% of the patients were different (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The overall performance of both monitors during propofol induction was similar. However, the different dynamic profiles of these monitors indicate that BIS may be a more useful index for evaluating intermediate anesthetic levels, whereas CSI may be better for evaluating deeper anesthetic levels.
引用
收藏
页码:605 / 610
页数:6
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]
Cerebral state monitor, a new small handheld EEG monitor for determining depth of anaesthesia: a clinical comparison with the bispectral index during day-surgery [J].
Anderson, RE ;
Jakobsson, JG .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2006, 23 (03) :208-212
[2]
Muscle relaxation does not alter hypnotic level during propofol anesthesia [J].
Greif, R ;
Greenwald, S ;
Schweitzer, E ;
Laciny, S ;
Rajek, A ;
Caldwell, JE ;
Sessler, DI .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2002, 94 (03) :604-608
[3]
Relationship between bispectral index, electroencephalographic state entropy and effect-site EC50 for propofol at different clinical endpoints [J].
Iannuzzi, M ;
Iannuzzi, E ;
Rossi, F ;
Berrino, L ;
Chiefari, M .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2005, 94 (05) :613-616
[4]
Propofol effective concentration 50 and its relationship to bispectral index [J].
Irwin, MG ;
Hui, TWC ;
Milne, SE ;
Kenny, GNC .
ANAESTHESIA, 2002, 57 (03) :242-248
[5]
Cerebral state index during propofol anesthesia [J].
Jensen, Erik W. ;
Litvan, Hector ;
Revuelta, Miren ;
Rodriguez, Bernardo E. ;
Caminal, Pere ;
Martinez, Pablo ;
Vereecke, Hugo ;
Struys, Michel M. R. F. .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2006, 105 (01) :28-36
[6]
Relationship between, bispectral index, auditory evoked potential index and effect-site EC50 for propofol at two clinical end-points [J].
Milne, SE ;
Troy, A ;
Irwin, MG ;
Kenny, GNC .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2003, 90 (02) :127-131
[7]
Time delay of index calculation - Analysis of cerebral state, bispectral, and narcotrend indices [J].
Pilge, S ;
Zanner, P ;
Schneider, G ;
Blum, J ;
Kreuzer, M ;
Kochs, EF .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2006, 104 (03) :488-494
[8]
A primer for EEG signal processing in anesthesia [J].
Rampil, IJ .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1998, 89 (04) :980-1002
[9]
RODRIGUEZ BE, 2004, 7 EUROSIVA M LISB
[10]
The influence of method of administration and covariates on the pharmacokinetics of propofol in adult volunteers [J].
Schnider, TW ;
Minto, CF ;
Gambus, PL ;
Andresen, C ;
Goodale, DB ;
Shafer, SL ;
Youngs, EJ .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1998, 88 (05) :1170-1182