Multilevel linear modelling for FMRI group analysis using Bayesian inference

被引:1316
作者
Woolrich, MW [1 ]
Behrens, TEJ
Beckmann, CF
Jenkinson, M
Smith, SM
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, John Radcliffe Hosp, Oxford Ctr Funct Magnet Resonance Imaging Brain, Oxford OX3 9DU, England
[2] Univ Oxford, Dept Engn Sci, Oxford OX1 3PJ, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会; 英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
mixed effects; random effects; FMRI; Bayes; reference priors; GLM;
D O I
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.12.023
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Functional magnetic resonance imaging studies often involve the acquisition of data from multiple sessions and/or multiple subjects. A hierarchical approach can be taken to modelling such data with a general linear model (GLM) at each level of the hierarchy introducing different random effects variance components. Inferring on these models is nontrivial with frequentist solutions being unavailable. A solution is to use a Bayesian framework. One important ingredient in this is the choice of prior on the variance components and top-level regression parameters. Due to the typically small numbers of sessions or subjects in neuroimaging, the choice of prior is critical. To alleviate this problem, we introduce to neuroimage modelling the approach of reference priors, which drives the choice of prior such that it is noninformative in an information-theoretic sense. We propose two inference techniques at the top level for multilevel hierarchies (a fast approach and a slower more accurate approach). We also demonstrate that we can infer on the top level of multilevel hierarchies by inferring on the levels of the hierarchy separately and passing summary statistics of a noncentral multivariate t distribution between them. (C) 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1732 / 1747
页数:16
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2000, Bayesian theory
[2]   General multilevel linear modeling for group analysis in FMRI [J].
Beckmann, CF ;
Jenkinson, M ;
Smith, SM .
NEUROIMAGE, 2003, 20 (02) :1052-1063
[3]  
Brent R. P., 1973, ALGORITHMS MINIMIZAT
[4]   Statistical methods of estimation and inference for functional MR image analysis [J].
Bullmore, E ;
Brammer, M ;
Williams, SCR ;
Rabehesketh, S ;
Janot, N ;
David, A ;
Mellers, J ;
Howard, R ;
Sham, P .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 1996, 35 (02) :261-277
[5]   PROBABILITY, FREQUENCY AND REASONABLE EXPECTATION [J].
COX, RT .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICS, 1946, 14 (01) :1-13
[6]  
Everitt BS, 1999, HUM BRAIN MAPP, V7, P1
[7]   REPEATED MEASURES IN CLINICAL-TRIALS - ANALYSIS USING MEAN SUMMARY STATISTICS AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR DESIGN [J].
FRISON, L ;
POCOCK, SJ .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 1992, 11 (13) :1685-1704
[8]   To smooth or not to smooth? Bias and efficiency in fMRI time-series analysis [J].
Friston, KJ ;
Josephs, O ;
Zarahn, E ;
Holmes, AP ;
Rouquette, S ;
Poline, JB .
NEUROIMAGE, 2000, 12 (02) :196-208
[9]   Bayesian estimation of dynamical systems: An application to fMRI [J].
Friston, KJ .
NEUROIMAGE, 2002, 16 (02) :513-530
[10]   Classical and Bayesian inference in neuroimaging: Theory [J].
Friston, KJ ;
Penny, W ;
Phillips, C ;
Kiebel, S ;
Hinton, G ;
Ashburner, J .
NEUROIMAGE, 2002, 16 (02) :465-483