Ecosystem function for water retention and forest ecosystem conservation in a watershed of the Yangtze River

被引:17
作者
Guo, ZW [1 ]
Gan, YL [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Zool, State Key Lab Integrated Management Pest Insects, Beijing 100080, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
conservation; ecosystem function; forest; spatial pattern; the Yangtze River; water retention; watershed;
D O I
10.1023/A:1015556522998
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
The ecosystem function for water retention in a watershed of the Yangtze River was discussed in this study. The watershed was divided into 90 types of vegetation-soil-slope complex. A GIS-embodied spatial database was used to explore the relationships between the capacity of water retention by a complex and its types of vegetation, soil and slope. Furthermore, the capacity of water retention of every complex was estimated statistically by using estimation models. The spatial distribution of various capacity of water retention in the watershed was demarcated on a map based on the attributions and the locations of complexes. In addition, we evaluated integrally the situation of water retention in the watershed based on the estimation for the complexes from which it was distinctly recognized that the serious situation mainly results from the poor capacity of water retention of vegetation. The variation-location effect describes the phenomenon in which an identical variation of a factor may produce different effects on overall situation, when this variation occurs in a different spatial location. According to the variation-location effect on the expansion of forestland, a strategy 'spatial pattern-based forestland extension' was proposed to conserve forest ecosystem and improve the situation of water retention in the watershed.
引用
收藏
页码:599 / 614
页数:16
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   A comparison of the enforcement of access restrictions between Xishuangbanna Nature Reserve (China) and Khao Yai National Park (Thailand) [J].
Albers, H ;
Grinspoon, E .
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION, 1997, 24 (04) :351-362
[2]  
Bradshaw TK, 1998, RURAL SOCIOL, V63, P1, DOI 10.1111/j.1549-0831.1998.tb00662.x
[3]  
Cacha M. D. M., 1994, Protected area economics and policy: linking conservation and sustainable development., P151
[4]   EVALUATING FIELD-BASED GIS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL CHARACTERIZATION, MODELING AND DECISION-SUPPORT [J].
CARVER, S ;
HEYWOOD, I ;
CORNELIUS, S ;
SEAR, D .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 1995, 9 (04) :475-486
[5]   The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital [J].
Costanza, R ;
dArge, R ;
deGroot, R ;
Farber, S ;
Grasso, M ;
Hannon, B ;
Limburg, K ;
Naeem, S ;
ONeill, RV ;
Paruelo, J ;
Raskin, RG ;
Sutton, P ;
vandenBelt, M .
NATURE, 1997, 387 (6630) :253-260
[6]  
COWEN DJ, 1995, PHOTOGRAMM ENG REM S, V61, P1393
[7]   Spatial economic valuation: Benefits transfer using geographical information systems [J].
Eade, JDO ;
Moran, D .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 1996, 48 (02) :97-110
[8]  
*ESRI, 1994, UND GIS ARC INFO MET
[9]   ECONOMIC VALUES OF DANUBE FLOODPLAINS [J].
GREN, IM ;
GROTH, KH ;
SYLVEN, M .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 1995, 45 (04) :333-345
[10]  
GROOT RS, 1994, PROTECTED AREA EC PO, P159