What proportion of primary psychiatric interventions are based on evidence from randomised controlled trials?
被引:45
作者:
Geddes, JR
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
OXFORD RADCLIFFE NHS TRUST, NUFFIELD DEPT MED, RES & DEV PROGRAMME CTR EVIDENCE BASED MED, OXFORD, ENGLANDOXFORD RADCLIFFE NHS TRUST, NUFFIELD DEPT MED, RES & DEV PROGRAMME CTR EVIDENCE BASED MED, OXFORD, ENGLAND
Geddes, JR
[1
]
Game, D
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
OXFORD RADCLIFFE NHS TRUST, NUFFIELD DEPT MED, RES & DEV PROGRAMME CTR EVIDENCE BASED MED, OXFORD, ENGLANDOXFORD RADCLIFFE NHS TRUST, NUFFIELD DEPT MED, RES & DEV PROGRAMME CTR EVIDENCE BASED MED, OXFORD, ENGLAND
Game, D
[1
]
Jenkins, NE
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
OXFORD RADCLIFFE NHS TRUST, NUFFIELD DEPT MED, RES & DEV PROGRAMME CTR EVIDENCE BASED MED, OXFORD, ENGLANDOXFORD RADCLIFFE NHS TRUST, NUFFIELD DEPT MED, RES & DEV PROGRAMME CTR EVIDENCE BASED MED, OXFORD, ENGLAND
Jenkins, NE
[1
]
Peterson, LA
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
OXFORD RADCLIFFE NHS TRUST, NUFFIELD DEPT MED, RES & DEV PROGRAMME CTR EVIDENCE BASED MED, OXFORD, ENGLANDOXFORD RADCLIFFE NHS TRUST, NUFFIELD DEPT MED, RES & DEV PROGRAMME CTR EVIDENCE BASED MED, OXFORD, ENGLAND
Peterson, LA
[1
]
Pottinger, GR
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
OXFORD RADCLIFFE NHS TRUST, NUFFIELD DEPT MED, RES & DEV PROGRAMME CTR EVIDENCE BASED MED, OXFORD, ENGLANDOXFORD RADCLIFFE NHS TRUST, NUFFIELD DEPT MED, RES & DEV PROGRAMME CTR EVIDENCE BASED MED, OXFORD, ENGLAND
Pottinger, GR
[1
]
Sackett, DL
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
OXFORD RADCLIFFE NHS TRUST, NUFFIELD DEPT MED, RES & DEV PROGRAMME CTR EVIDENCE BASED MED, OXFORD, ENGLANDOXFORD RADCLIFFE NHS TRUST, NUFFIELD DEPT MED, RES & DEV PROGRAMME CTR EVIDENCE BASED MED, OXFORD, ENGLAND
Sackett, DL
[1
]
机构:
[1] OXFORD RADCLIFFE NHS TRUST, NUFFIELD DEPT MED, RES & DEV PROGRAMME CTR EVIDENCE BASED MED, OXFORD, ENGLAND
来源:
QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE
|
1996年
/
5卷
/
04期
关键词:
psychiatry;
interventions;
evidence;
D O I:
10.1136/qshc.5.4.215
中图分类号:
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号:
摘要:
Objectives-To estimate the proportion of psychiatric inpatients receiving primary interventions based on randomised controlled trials or systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials. Design-Retrospective survey. Setting-Acute adult general psychiatric ward. Subjects-All patients admitted to the ward during a 28 day period. Main outcome measures-Primary interventions were classified according to whether or not they were supported by evidence from randomised controlled trials or systematic reviews. Results-The primary interventions received by 26/40 (65%; 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 51% to 79%) of patients admitted during the period were based on randomised trials or systematic reviews. Conclusions-When patients were used as the denominator, most primary interventions given in acute general psychiatry were based on experimental evidence. The evidence was difficult to locate; there is an urgent need for systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials in this area.