'Two sides of the coin' - the value of personal continuity to GPs: a qualitative interview study

被引:69
作者
Ridd, Matthew [1 ]
Shaw, Alison [1 ]
Salisbury, Chris [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bristol, Acad Unit Primary Hlth Care, Bristol BS6 6JL, Avon, England
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
continuity of patient care; attitude of health professional; family practice;
D O I
10.1093/fampra/cml010
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background. Continuity is thought to be important to GPs but the values behind this are unknown. Objectives. To explore the values that doctors working in general practice attach to continuity of patient care and to outline how these values are applied in practice. Methods. In-depth qualitative interview with 24 GPs in England. Participants were purposefully sampled according to personal and practice characteristics. Analysis was thematic, drawing on the constant comparative method. Results. The majority of doctors valued doctor-patient, or personal, continuity in their everyday work. It was most valued in patients with serious, complex or psychological problems. GPs believed that through their personal knowledge of the patient and the doctor-patient relationship, personal continuity enabled them to provide higher quality care. However, the benefits of personal continuity were balanced against problems, and GPs identified personal, professional and external constraints that limited its provision. GPs seemed to have resolved the tension between the benefits, limits and constraints they described by accepting an increased reliance on continuity being provided within teams. Conclusion. Personal continuity may offer important benefits to doctors and patients, but we do not know how unique its values are. In particular, it is not clear whether the same benefits can be achieved within teams, the level at which continuity is increasingly being provided. The relative advantages and limits of the different means of delivering continuity need to be better understood, before further policy changes that affect personal continuity are introduced.
引用
收藏
页码:461 / 468
页数:8
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
Adam R, 2001, J Health Serv Res Policy, V6, P129, DOI 10.1258/1355819011927323
[2]  
[Anonymous], IMPR CHRON DIS MAN
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1998, TECHNIQUES PROCEDURE
[4]   The harmful consequences of elevating the doctor-patient relationship to be a primary goal of the general practice consultation [J].
Chew-Graham, CA ;
May, CR ;
Roland, MO .
FAMILY PRACTICE, 2004, 21 (03) :229-231
[5]   Qualitative research and the problem of judgement: lessons from interviewing fellow professionals [J].
Chew-Graham, CA ;
May, CR ;
Perry, MS .
FAMILY PRACTICE, 2002, 19 (03) :285-289
[6]  
*DEP HLTH, 2000, NHS PLAN PLAN INV PL
[7]  
*DEP HLTH, 2003, BUILD BEST CHOIC RES
[8]  
EVANS J, 2002, 83 ROYAL COLL GEN PR
[9]   What future for continuity of care in general practice? [J].
Freeman, G ;
Hjortdahl, P .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1997, 314 (7098) :1870-1873
[10]  
Freeman G., 2001, Continuity of care: report of a scoping exercise for the National Co-ordinating Centre for NHS Service Delivery and Organisation NCCSDO