Total Knee Arthroplasty After High Tibial Osteotomy Results in Excellent Long-Term Survivorship and Clinical Outcomes

被引:50
作者
Chalmers, Brian P. [1 ]
Limberg, Afton K. [1 ]
Tibbo, Meagan E. [1 ]
Perry, Kevin I. [1 ]
Pagnano, Mark W. [1 ]
Abdel, Matthew P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Dept Orthoped Surg, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
关键词
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; CLOSING-WEDGE; FOLLOW-UP; RISK-FACTORS; REVISION; OSTEOARTHRITIS; SURVIVAL; PATIENT; AGE;
D O I
10.2106/JBJS.18.01060
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
100224 [整形外科学];
摘要
Background: Some prior reports of total knee arthroplasty after high tibial osteotomy have shown high rates of aseptic loosening. As such, the goal of this study was to analyze the outcomes of contemporary total knee arthroplasty after high tibial osteotomy, with particular emphasis on survivorship free from aseptic loosening, any revision, and any reoperation; complications; radiographic results; and clinical outcomes. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 207 patients who underwent 231 total knee arthroplasties using cemented prostheses after high tibial osteotomy from 2000 to 2012 through our total joint registry: 87% were after a closing-wedge osteotomy and 13% were after an opening-wedge osteotomy. The mean follow-up from total knee arthroplasty was 8 years. At the time of the total knee arthroplasty, the mean age was 64 years and the mean body mass index was 31 kg/m(2). The majority of total knee arthroplasties had a posterior-stabilized design (93%), and 4% had a varus-valgus constraint design. Tibial stems were utilized in 8% of cases. Bivariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were utilized to analyze risk factors for poorer survival. Results: At 10 years, survivorship free from aseptic loosening was 97%, survivorship free from any revision was 90%, and survivorship free from any reoperation was 85%. Fifteen patients (15 total knee arthroplasties [6%]) underwent aseptic revision, most commonly for instability (3%), aseptic loosening (2%), and periprosthetic fracture (1%). On bivariate analysis, patient age of <60 years was a significant risk factor for poorer revision-free survival (hazard ratio, 2.9; p = 0.02); on multivariate analysis, younger age was the only significant risk factor for revision (p = 0.04). There were 14 complications (6%), the most common being a manipulation under anesthesia in 9 cases (4%). No unrevised total knee arthroplasties had definitive radiographic evidence of loosening. Knee Society scores improved from a mean preoperative score of 59 points to a mean postoperative score of 93 points (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Contemporary total knee arthroplasty with a cemented prosthesis after high tibial osteotomy demonstrated excellent long-term durability, with 10-year survivorship free from aseptic loosening of 97%. There was reliable improvement in clinical outcomes, but perfect knee balance was sometimes challenging, as reflected by a 4% prevalence of manipulation under anesthesia and a 3% prevalence of revision for instability.
引用
收藏
页码:970 / 978
页数:9
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]
A randomized controlled trial of fixed-versus mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty A FOLLOW-UP AT A MEAN OF TEN YEARS [J].
Abdel, M. P. ;
Tibbo, M. E. ;
Stuart, M. J. ;
Trousdale, R. T. ;
Hanssen, A. D. ;
Pagnano, M. W. .
BONE & JOINT JOURNAL, 2018, 100B (07) :925-929
[2]
Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty in the Young Patient: Is There Trouble on the Horizon? [J].
Aggarwal, Vinay K. ;
Goyal, Nitin ;
Deirmengian, Gregory ;
Rangavajulla, Ashwin ;
Parvizi, Javad ;
Austin, Matthew S. .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2014, 96A (07) :536-542
[3]
Comparison of mid-term results between conversion total knee arthroplasties following closed wedge high tibial osteotomy and primary total knee arthroplasties: A matched pair study including patellar symptom and position [J].
Bae, Dae Kyung ;
Song, Sang Jun ;
Park, Cheol Hee ;
Liang, Hu ;
Bae, Jung Kwon .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SCIENCE, 2017, 22 (03) :495-500
[4]
Statistics notes - Survival probabilities (the Kaplan-Meier method) [J].
Bland, JM ;
Altman, DG .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1998, 317 (7172) :1572-1572
[5]
Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty vs High Tibial Osteotomy for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [J].
Cao, ZhenWu ;
Mai, XiuJun ;
Wang, Jun ;
Feng, EnHui ;
Huang, YongMing .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2018, 33 (03) :952-959
[6]
Comparison of Closing-Wedge and Opening-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy for Medial Compartment Osteoarthritis of the Knee A Randomized Controlled Trial with a Six-Year Follow-up [J].
Duivenvoorden, T. ;
Brouwer, R. W. ;
Baan, A. ;
Bos, P. K. ;
Reijman, M. ;
Bierma-Zeinstra, S. M. A. ;
Verhaar, J. A. N. .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2014, 96A (17) :1425-1432
[7]
Have the Causes of Revision for Total and Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasties Changed During the Past Two Decades? [J].
Dyrhovden, Gro S. ;
Lygre, Stein Hakon L. ;
Badawy, Mona ;
Gothesen, Oystein ;
Furnes, Ove .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2017, 475 (07) :1874-1886
[8]
Total knee arthroplasty after opening-versus closing-wedge high tibial osteotomy. A 135-case series with minimum 5-year follow-up [J].
Ehlinger, M. ;
D'Ambrosio, A. ;
Vie, P. ;
Leclerc, S. ;
Bonnomet, F. ;
Bonnevialle, P. ;
Lustig, S. ;
Parratte, S. ;
Colmar, M. ;
Argenson, J. -N. .
ORTHOPAEDICS & TRAUMATOLOGY-SURGERY & RESEARCH, 2017, 103 (07) :1035-1039
[9]
EI-Galaly A, 2018, J ARTHROPLASTY, V33
[10]
Return to Work and Sport Following High Tibial Osteotomy A Systematic Review [J].
Ekhtiari, Seper ;
Haldane, Chloe E. ;
de Sa, Darren ;
Simunovic, Nicole ;
Musahl, Volker ;
Ayeni, Olufemi R. .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2016, 98 (18) :1568-1577