An evaluation of methods for detecting brain activations from functional neuroimages

被引:45
作者
Lukic, AS
Wernick, MN
Strother, SC
机构
[1] IIT, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Chicago, IL 60616 USA
[2] Univ Minnesota, VA Med Ctr, Neuroimaging Consortium 11, Minneapolis, MN 55417 USA
关键词
PET; fMRI; signal detection; ROC; multivariate statistics;
D O I
10.1016/S0933-3657(02)00009-X
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Brain activation studies based on PET or fMRI seek to explore neuroscience questions by statistically analyzing the acquired images to produce statistical parametric images (SPIs). An increasingly wide range of univariate and multivariate analysis techniques are used to generate SPIs in order to detect mean-signal activations and/or long-range spatial interactions. However, little is known about the comparative detection performance of even simple techniques in finite data sets. Our aims are (1) to empirically compare the detection performance of a range of techniques using simulations of a simple image phantom and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis, and (2) to construct two near-optimal detectors, both generalized likelihood ratio tests as upper performance bounds. We found that for finite samples of (10-100) images, even when the t-test with single-voxel variance estimates (single-voxel t-test) is the "correct" (i.e. unbiased) model for simple local additive signals, better detection performance is obtained using pooled variance estimates or adaptive, multivariate covariance-based detectors. Normalization by voxel-based variance estimates causes significantly decreased detection performance using either single-voxel t-tests or correlation-coefficient thresholding compared to pooled-variance t-tests or covariance thresholding, respectively. Moreover, we found that SVD by itself, or followed by an adaptive Fisher linear discriminant, provides a detector that is (1) more sensitive to mean differences than a single-voxel t-test, (2) insensitive to the large local signal variances detected by covariance thresholding, and (3) much more sensitive to signal correlations than correlation-coefficient thresholding. Adaptive, multivariate covariance-based approaches and pooled-variance t-tests represent promising directions for obtaining optimal signal detection in functional neuroimaging studies. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:69 / 88
页数:20
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1979, Multivariate analysis
[2]   On the detection of activation patterns using principal components analysis [J].
Ardekani, BA ;
Strother, SC ;
Anderson, JR ;
Law, I ;
Paulson, OB ;
Kanno, I ;
Rottenberg, DA .
QUANTITATIVE FUNCTIONAL BRAIN IMAGING WITH POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY, 1998, :253-257
[3]   Comparison of two exploratory data analysis methods for fMRI: fuzzy clustering vs. principal component analysis [J].
Baumgartner, R ;
Ryner, L ;
Richter, W ;
Summers, R ;
Jarmasz, M ;
Somorjai, R .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2000, 18 (01) :89-94
[4]  
Beckmann CF, 2001, NEUROIMAGE, V13, pS75
[5]  
BESAG J, 1989, J APPL STAT, V16, P395, DOI DOI 10.1080/02664768900000049
[6]   How good is good enough in path analysis of fMRI data? [J].
Bullmore, ET ;
Horwitz, B ;
Honey, G ;
Brammer, M ;
Williams, S ;
Sharma, T .
NEUROIMAGE, 2000, 11 (04) :289-301
[7]   GLUCOSE USE CORRELATIONS - A MATTER OF INFERENCE [J].
CLARK, CM ;
STOESSL, AJ .
JOURNAL OF CEREBRAL BLOOD FLOW AND METABOLISM, 1986, 6 (04) :511-512
[8]   Is multivariate analysis of PET data more revealing than the univariate approach? Evidence from a study of episodic memory retrieval [J].
Fletcher, PC ;
Dolan, RJ ;
Shallice, T ;
Frith, CD ;
Frackowiak, RSJ ;
Friston, KJ .
NEUROIMAGE, 1996, 3 (03) :209-215
[9]  
Friston K., 1995, HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING, V2, P189, DOI [DOI 10.1002/HBM.460020402, 10.1002/hbm.460020402]
[10]   FUNCTIONAL CONNECTIVITY - THE PRINCIPAL-COMPONENT ANALYSIS OF LARGE (PET) DATA SETS [J].
FRISTON, KJ ;
FRITH, CD ;
LIDDLE, PF ;
FRACKOWIAK, RSJ .
JOURNAL OF CEREBRAL BLOOD FLOW AND METABOLISM, 1993, 13 (01) :5-14