Characterization of flue gas desulfurization particulates in equalization basins

被引:8
作者
Iannacone, Meg M. [1 ]
Castle, James W. [1 ]
Rodgers, John H., Jr. [2 ]
机构
[1] Clemson Univ, Dept Environm Engn & Earth Sci, Clemson, SC 29634 USA
[2] Clemson Univ, Dept Forestry & Nat Resources, Clemson, SC 29634 USA
基金
美国能源部;
关键词
Flue gas desulfurization; Particles; Scrubber; Water; Settling; WETLAND TREATMENT SYSTEM; FIRED POWER-PLANT; COAL FLY-ASH; CHEMICAL-COMPOSITION; BY-PRODUCTS; PERFORMANCE; MINERALOGY; FRACTIONS; PARTICLES; CHEMISTRY;
D O I
10.1016/j.fuel.2009.02.035
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Particulates in pilot-scale flue gas desulfurization (FGD) scrubber water were characterized by powder X-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscopy with energy dispersive spectroscopy, and size analysis based on Stokes' Law after settling in an equalization basin of a pilot-scale constructed wetland treatment system. Three sources were interpreted for specific particle types identified in samples analyzed: FGD wet scrubbing processes, coal combustion by products, and uncombusted material from coal. Gypsum (CaSO4 center dot 2H(2)O) from the FGD scrubbing process comprises similar to 95% of the particulates. Iron oxide particles and cenospheres in the particulate samples are interpreted as coal combustion products. Particles interpreted as originating from unburned coal contain carbon and metals including Zn and Fe. The most abundant elements in the particulates analyzed are 0, C. Ca, 5, Fe, and Si, with maximum mean content of individual elements ranging from 13% to 70% among particle types. Less abundant elements include Al, K, Mg, Ti, and Mo, with maximum mean content from 0.1% to 3.8%. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1580 / 1587
页数:8
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
*AM COAL ASH ASS, CCP SURV
[2]   Mineralogical and engineering characteristics of dry flue gas desulfurization products [J].
Bigham, JM ;
Kost, DA ;
Stehouwer, RC ;
Beeghly, JH ;
Fowler, R ;
Traina, SJ ;
Wolfe, WE ;
Dick, WA .
FUEL, 2005, 84 (14-15) :1839-1848
[3]  
Eggert D.A., 2008, ENV GEOSCIENCES, V15, P115, DOI DOI 10.1306/EG.07050707007
[4]  
Folk R. L., 1980, PETROLOGY SEDIMENTAR
[5]  
Gee G. W., 1996, METHODS SOIL ANAL 1, P383, DOI DOI 10.2136/SSSABOOKSER5.1.2ED.C15
[6]   Micro- and nanochemistry of fly ash from a coal-fired power plant [J].
Gieré, R ;
Carleton, LE ;
Lumpkin, GR .
AMERICAN MINERALOGIST, 2003, 88 (11-12) :1853-1865
[7]   Transfers and transformations of zinc in constructed wetlands: Mitigation of a refinery effluent [J].
Gillespie, WB ;
Hawkins, WB ;
Rodgers, JH ;
Cano, ML ;
Dorn, PB .
ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2000, 14 (03) :279-292
[8]   Morphology and chemistry of fine particles emitted from a Canadian coal-fired power plant [J].
Goodarzi, F .
FUEL, 2006, 85 (03) :273-280
[9]  
GYPSUM FA, 2003, US GEOLOGICAL SURVEY, V1
[10]   Petrology, mineralogy, and chemistry of magnetically-separated sized fly ash [J].
Hower, JC ;
Rathbone, RF ;
Robertson, JD ;
Peterson, G ;
Trimble, AS .
FUEL, 1999, 78 (02) :197-203