Overestimating the size of hepatic malignancy on helical CT during arterial portography: Equilibrium phase CT and pathology

被引:22
作者
Kanematsu, M
Hoshi, H
Yamada, T
Nandate, Y
Kato, M
Yokoyama, R
Murakami, T
Nakamura, H
机构
[1] GIFU UNIV,SCH MED,DEPT PATHOL 2,GIFU 500,JAPAN
[2] GIFU UNIV,SCH MED,DEPT SURG 2,GIFU 500,JAPAN
[3] OSAKA UNIV,SCH MED,DEPT RADIOL,OSAKA,JAPAN
关键词
computed tomography; comparative studies; liver; neoplasms; portography; arterial; localization;
D O I
10.1097/00004728-199709000-00006
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: Overestimating the size of hepatic malignancy with helical CT during arterial portography (CTAP) can be a potential pitfall in determining liver resection area. We evaluated the prevalence and extent of overestimation of hepatic malignancy on CTAP in correlation with helical equilibrium phase CT (EPCT) and pathologic findings. Method: CTAP and EPCT in 47 histologically proven malignant hepatic tumors [33 hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) and 14 metastases] in 39 patients were retrospectively studied. Nineteen tumors were resected and pathologically evaluated. Results: The size overestimation ratios (CTAP/EPCT) ranged from 1.02 to 1.56 (mean +/- SD 1.24 +/- 0.16) in HCC and from 1.00 to 2.48 (1.34 +/- 0.42) in metastasis. In 19 surgical specimens, the overestimation ratios (CTAP/specimen) ranged from 1.05 to 1.45 (1.20 +/- 0.13) in HCC and from 1.10 to 1.38 (1.22 +/- 0.10) in metastasis. Histopathologically, flattening of parenchymal structures (100%), atrophy of hepatic cords (95%), sinusoidal congestions (95%), fibrosis and ductular proliferation (58%), and no tumor were seen in peritumoral parenchyma corresponding to perilesional perfusion defects with CTAP. Conclusion: CTAP frequently and significantly overestimates the size of malignant hepatic tumors. This phenomenon is attributable to either benign histopathological changes in the perilesional liver parenchyma caused by parenchymal compression or portal venous obstruction by malignant liver tumors or to a siphoning effect by hypervascular neoplasms.
引用
收藏
页码:713 / 719
页数:7
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   INTRAHEPATIC RECURRENCE AFTER RESECTION OF HEPATOCELLULAR-CARCINOMA COMPLICATING CIRRHOSIS [J].
BELGHITI, J ;
PANIS, Y ;
FARGES, O ;
BENHAMOU, JP ;
FEKETE, F .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1991, 214 (02) :114-117
[2]   NONTUMOROUS LOW-ATTENUATION DEFECTS IN THE LIVER ON HELICAL CT DURING ARTERIAL PORTOGRAPHY - FREQUENCY, LOCATION, AND APPEARANCE [J].
BLUEMKE, DA ;
SOYER, P ;
FISHMAN, EK .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1995, 164 (05) :1141-1145
[3]   SPIRAL CT ARTERIAL PORTOGRAPHY OF THE LIVER [J].
BLUEMKE, DA ;
FISHMAN, EK .
RADIOLOGY, 1993, 186 (02) :576-579
[4]   DETECTION OF FOCAL HEPATIC MASSES - PROSPECTIVE EVALUATION WITH CT, DELAYED CT, CT DURING ARTERIAL PORTOGRAPHY, AND MR IMAGING [J].
HEIKEN, JP ;
WEYMAN, PJ ;
LEE, JKT ;
BALFE, DM ;
PICUS, D ;
BRUNT, EM ;
FLYE, MW .
RADIOLOGY, 1989, 171 (01) :47-51
[5]   TRANSIENT HEPATIC ATTENUATION DIFFERENCE OF LOBAR OR SEGMENTAL DISTRIBUTION DETECTED BY DYNAMIC COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY [J].
ITAI, Y ;
MOSS, AA ;
GOLDBERG, HI .
RADIOLOGY, 1982, 144 (04) :835-839
[6]  
ITAI Y, 1987, J COMPUT ASSIST TOMO, V11, P465
[7]   HEPATOCELLULAR-CARCINOMA - MR IMAGING [J].
ITOH, K ;
FUJISAWA, I ;
SAGOH, T ;
MORI, K ;
NISHIMURA, K ;
NOMA, S ;
NAKANO, Y ;
OZAWA, K ;
TOGASHI, K ;
MINAMI, S ;
ITOH, H ;
TORIZUKA, K .
RADIOLOGY, 1987, 164 (01) :21-25
[8]   MR DEMONSTRATION OF EDEMA ADJACENT TO A LIVER METASTASIS - PATHOLOGICAL CORRELATION [J].
LEE, MJ ;
SAINI, S ;
COMPTON, CC ;
MALT, RA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1991, 157 (03) :499-501
[9]   CT DEMONSTRATION OF LOW-DENSITY RING IN LIVER METASTASES [J].
LIN, G ;
GUSTAFSON, T ;
HAGERSTRAND, I ;
LUNDERQUIST, A .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 1984, 8 (03) :450-452
[10]   DYNAMIC COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY DURING ARTERIAL PORTOGRAPHY - THE MOST SENSITIVE EXAMINATION FOR SMALL HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMAS [J].
MATSUI, O ;
TAKASHIMA, T ;
KADOYA, M ;
IDA, M ;
SUZUKI, M ;
KITAGAWA, K ;
KAMIMURA, R ;
INOUE, K ;
KONISHI, H ;
ITOH, H .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 1985, 9 (01) :19-24