A model of consumers' risk perceptions toward recombinant bovine growth hormone (rhGH): The impact of risk characteristics

被引:20
作者
Grobe, D
Douthitt, R
Zepeda, L
机构
[1] Oregon State Univ, Corvallis, OR 97330 USA
[2] Univ Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706 USA
关键词
risk perception; risk characteristics; outrage factors; rbGH; ordered probit;
D O I
10.1023/A:1007085603876
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
This study estimates the effect risk characteristics, described as outrage factors by Hadden, have on consumers' risk perceptions toward the food-related biotechnology, recombinant bovine growth hormone (rbGH). The outrage factors applicable to milk from rbGH treated herds are involuntary risk exposure, unfamiliarity with the product's production process, unnatural product characteristics, lack of trust in regulator's ability to protect consumers in the marketplace, and consumers' inability to distinguish milk from rbGH treated herds compared to milk from untreated herds. An empirical analysis of data from a national survey of household food shoppers reveals that outrage factors mediate risk perceptions. The results support the inclusion of outrage factors into the risk perception model for the rbGH product, as they add significantly to the explanatory power of the model and therefore reduce bias compared to a simpler model of attitudinal and demographic factors. The study indicates that outrage factors which have a significant impact on risk perceptions are the lack of trust in the FDA as a food-related information source, and perceiving no consumer benefits from farmers' use of rbGH. Communication strategies to reduce consumer risk perceptions therefore could utilize agencies perceived as more trustworthy and emphasize the benefits of rbGH use to consumers.
引用
收藏
页码:661 / 673
页数:13
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1976, J ELECTROCHEMICAL SO, DOI DOI 10.1149/1.2132690
[2]  
AULD GW, 1994, FOOD TECHNOL-CHICAGO, V48, P100
[3]  
BUSCH L, 1991, FOOD TECHNOL APR, P96
[4]  
Centner T. J., 1996, Choices. The Magazine of Food, Farm, and Resources Issues, P34
[5]  
DITTUS KL, 1993, FOOD TECHNOL-CHICAGO, V47, P87
[6]  
DOUTHITT RA, 1996, 68 I RES POV
[7]   Public perceptions of everyday food hazards: A psychometric study [J].
FifeSchaw, C ;
Rowe, G .
RISK ANALYSIS, 1996, 16 (04) :487-500
[8]  
*FIN TRAV ASS INC, 1986, CONS RESP INTR BST T
[9]   HOW SAFE IS SAFE ENOUGH - PSYCHOMETRIC STUDY OF ATTITUDES TOWARDS TECHNOLOGICAL RISKS AND BENEFITS [J].
FISCHHOFF, B ;
SLOVIC, P ;
LICHTENSTEIN, S ;
READ, S ;
COMBS, B .
POLICY SCIENCES, 1978, 9 (02) :127-152
[10]   GENDER, RACE, AND PERCEPTION OF ENVIRONMENTAL-HEALTH RISKS [J].
FLYNN, J ;
SLOVIC, P ;
MERTZ, CK .
RISK ANALYSIS, 1994, 14 (06) :1101-1108