Blood pressure reduction and renin-angiotensin system inhibition for prevention of congestive heart failure: a meta-analysis

被引:54
作者
Verdecchia, Paolo [1 ]
Angeli, Fabio
Cavallini, Claudio
Gattobigio, Roberto
Gentile, Giorgio [2 ]
Staessen, Jan A. [3 ,4 ]
Reboldi, Gianpaolo [2 ]
机构
[1] Osped S Maria Misericordia, Unita Ric Clin Cardiol Prevent, I-06132 Perugia, Italy
[2] Univ Perugia, Dipartimento Med Interna, I-06100 Perugia, Italy
[3] Univ Louvain, Dept Cardiovasc Dis, Div Hypertens & Cardiovasc Res, Louvain, Belgium
[4] Univ Maastricht, Dept Epidemiol, Maastricht, Netherlands
关键词
Hypertension; Therapy; Congestive heart failure; Myocardial infarction; Sudden cardiac death; Unstable angina; Stroke; Prognosis; Prevention; Meta-analysis; Meta-regression; CONVERTING-ENZYME-INHIBITORS; CARDIOVASCULAR MORBIDITY; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; SYSTOLIC HYPERTENSION; ACTIVE TREATMENT; END-POINT; CORONARY; MORTALITY; OUTCOMES; DISEASE;
D O I
10.1093/eurheartj/ehn575
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
It is unclear whether prevention of congestive heart failure (CHF) by drugs that inhibit the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) occurs over and beyond the reduction in blood pressure (BP) achieved by these drugs. We conducted a meta-analysis of trials comparing angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs), angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARBs), or calcium-channel blockers (CCBs), with diuretics, beta-blockers, or placebo in hypertensive or high-risk subjects without CHF at entry. Both fixed- and random-effect models were used. In trials vs. placebo, the risk of CHF was reduced by 21% with ACEIs (P = 0.007), whereas the effect of ARBs and CCBs was not significant (random-effect models). Thus, CCBs did not increase the risk of CHF. In trials vs. diuretics/beta-blockers, no differences were found between ACEIs and comparators [odds ratio (OR) 1.02; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.84-1.24], whereas CCBs were associated with an 18% higher risk of CHF (OR 1.18; 95% CI 1.00-1.39; P = 0.048). Therefore, ACEIs were not superior to diuretics/beta-blockers for the prevention of CHF. Because heterogeneity between trials was significant, we investigated potential sources of heterogeneity by meta-regression. The risk of CHF decreased by 24% (P < 0.001) for each 5 mmHg reduction in systolic BP. The risk of CHF was 19% less with ACEIs/ARBs than CCBs (P < 0.001) and 16% less in studies without multiple risk factors required for entry (P = 0.009). BP reduction is beneficial for the prevention of CHF. Over and beyond BP reduction, the protective effect of ACEIs and ARBs is greater than that of CCBs.
引用
收藏
页码:679 / 688
页数:10
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]  
Agodoa L, 2007, J HYPERTENS, V25, P951
[2]  
*ALLHAT OFF COORD, 2002, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V288, P2981, DOI DOI 10.1001/JAMA.288.23.2981
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2001, SYSTEMATIC REV HLTH, DOI DOI 10.1002/9780470693926
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2000, WILEY SERIES PROBABI
[5]   Cardiovascular outcomes in the Irbesartan Diabetic Nephropathy Trial of patients with type 2 diabetes and overt nephropathy [J].
Berl, T ;
Hunsicker, LG ;
Lewis, JB ;
Pfeffer, MA ;
Porush, JG ;
Rouleau, JL ;
Drury, PL ;
Esmatjes, E ;
Hricik, D ;
Parikh, CR ;
Raz, I ;
Vanhille, P ;
Wiegmann, TB ;
Wolfe, BM ;
Locatelli, F ;
Goldhaber, SZ ;
Lewis, EJ .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2003, 138 (07) :542-549
[6]   Principal results of the Controlled Onset Verapamil Investigation of Cardiovascular End Points (CONVINCE) Trial [J].
Black, HR ;
Elliott, WJ ;
Grandits, G ;
Grambsch, P ;
Lucente, T ;
White, WB ;
Neaton, JD ;
Grimm, RH ;
Hansson, L ;
Lacourcière, Y ;
Muller, J ;
Sleight, P ;
Weber, MA ;
Williams, G ;
Wittes, J ;
Zanchetti, A ;
Anders, RJ .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2003, 289 (16) :2073-2082
[7]   Final outcome results of the multicenter isradipine diuretic atherosclerosis study (MIDAS) - A randomized controlled trial [J].
Borhani, NO ;
Mercuri, M ;
Borhani, PA ;
Buckalew, VM ;
CanossaTerris, M ;
Carr, AA ;
Kappagoda, T ;
Rocco, MV ;
Schnaper, HW ;
Sowers, JR ;
Bond, MG .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1996, 276 (10) :785-791
[8]  
Bosch J, 2006, NEW ENGL J MED, V355, P1551
[9]  
Braunwald E, 2004, NEW ENGL J MED, V351, P2058
[10]   Effects of losartan on renal and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy [J].
Brenner, BM ;
Cooper, ME ;
de Zeeuw, D ;
Keane, WF ;
Mitch, WE ;
Parving, HH ;
Remuzzi, G ;
Snapinn, SM ;
Zhang, ZX ;
Shahinfar, S .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2001, 345 (12) :861-869