Patients with prior second-trimester loss: Prophylactic cerclage or serial transvaginal sonograms?

被引:48
作者
Berghella, V [1 ]
Haas, S [1 ]
Chervoneva, I [1 ]
Hyslop, T [1 ]
机构
[1] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Jefferson Med Coll, Div Maternal Fetal Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
关键词
cerclage; transvaginal sonography; second-trimester loss;
D O I
10.1067/mob.2002.124289
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To compare management with prophylactic cerclage versus serial transvaginal sonograms of the cervix in patients with prior second-trimester loss. STUDY DESIGN: Singleton pregnancies with prior second-trimester spontaneous loss between 14 and 24 weeks' gestation were retrospectively reviewed. At the obstetricians' discretion, some were managed with prophylactic cerclage and some with serial transvaginal sonograms of the cervix, starting at 14 weeks, and cerclage only if cervical length was <25 min or funneling was >25% before 24 weeks. All cerclages were McDonald. Primary outcome was preterm delivery at <35 weeks. RESULTS: Of 177 patients with singleton pregnancies who had prior second-trimester loss identified, 66 received prophylactic cerclage and 111 were followed up with transvaginal sonography, of which 36% (40/111) had therapeutic cerclage because of cervical changes. The two management groups of prophylactic cerclage versus transvaginal sonography of the cervix did not differ in any measure of obstetric outcome, including preterm delivery at <35 weeks (23% vs 30%; P =.3), preterm delivery at <33 weeks (21% vs 26%; P=.5), or gestational age at delivery (34.6 +/- 6.8 weeks vs 34.4 +/- 6.8 weeks; P =.8). CONCLUSION: In patients with prior second-trimester loss, serial transvaginal sonography of the cervix, with cerclage only if indicated by cervical changes, is a valuable alternative to a policy of uniform prophylactic cerclage.
引用
收藏
页码:747 / 751
页数:5
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]   Cervical Incompetence Prevention Randomized Cerclage Trial (CIPRACT): Study design and preliminary results [J].
Althuisius, SM ;
Dekker, GA ;
van Geijn, HP ;
Bekedam, DJ ;
Hummel, P .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2000, 183 (04) :823-829
[2]  
*AM COLL OBST GYN, 1995, TECHN B AM COLL OBST, V206
[3]   Prediction of preterm delivery with transvaginal ultrasonography of the cervix in patients with high-risk pregnancies: Does cerclage prevent prematurity? [J].
Berghella, V ;
Daly, SF ;
Tolosa, JE ;
DiVito, MM ;
Chalmers, R ;
Garg, N ;
Bhullar, A ;
Wapner, RJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1999, 181 (04) :809-815
[4]   Cervical ultrasonography compared with manual examination as a predictor of preterm delivery [J].
Berghella, V ;
Tolosa, JE ;
Kuhlman, K ;
Weiner, S ;
Bolognese, RJ ;
Wapner, RJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1997, 177 (04) :723-730
[5]   Transvaginal ultrasound in the management of women with suspected cervical incompetence [J].
Fox, R ;
James, M ;
Tuohy, J ;
Wardle, P .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1996, 103 (09) :921-924
[6]   Pregnancy outcomes in women treated with elective versus ultrasound-indicated cervical cerclage [J].
Guzman, ER ;
Forster, JK ;
Vintzileos, AM ;
Ananth, CV ;
Walters, C ;
Gipson, K .
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 1998, 12 (05) :323-327
[7]   The length of the cervix and the risk of spontaneous premature delivery [J].
Iams, JD ;
Goldenberg, RL ;
Meis, PJ ;
Mercer, BM ;
Moawad, A ;
Das, A ;
Thom, E ;
McNellis, D ;
Copper, RL ;
Johnson, F ;
Roberts, JM ;
Hauth, JC ;
Northern, A ;
Neely, C ;
MuellerHeubach, E ;
Swain, M ;
Frye, A ;
Lindheimer, M ;
Jones, P ;
Brown, MEL ;
Siddiqi, TA ;
Elder, N ;
Coombs, T ;
VanHorn, J ;
Bain, R ;
Leuchtenburg, L ;
Fischer, M ;
Harger, JH ;
Cotroneo, M ;
Stallings, C ;
Yaffe, S ;
Catz, C ;
Klebanoff, M ;
Landon, MB ;
Schneider, J ;
Mueller, C ;
Carey, JC ;
Meier, A ;
Liles, E ;
Newman, RB ;
Collins, BA ;
Metcalf, T ;
Odell, V ;
Sibai, B ;
Ramsey, R ;
Fricke, JL ;
Treadwell, M ;
Norman, GS .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1996, 334 (09) :567-572
[8]   Early transvaginal ultrasonography versus early cerclage in women with an unclear history of incompetent cervix [J].
Kelly, S ;
Pollock, M ;
Maas, B ;
LeFebvre, C ;
Manley, J ;
Sciscione, A .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2001, 184 (06) :1097-1099
[9]   MULTICENTERED CONTROLLED TRIAL OF CERVICAL CERCLAGE IN WOMEN AT MODERATE RISK OF PRETERM DELIVERY [J].
LAZAR, P ;
GUEGUEN, S ;
DREYFUS, J ;
RENAUD, R ;
PONTONNIER, G ;
PAPIERNIK, E .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1984, 91 (08) :731-735
[10]  
MACNAUGHTON MC, 1993, BRIT J OBSTET GYNAEC, V100, P516