The salt output of a nebulizer - a comparison between two nebulizer types

被引:9
作者
Eklund, L [1 ]
Sundblad, BM [1 ]
Malmberg, P [1 ]
Larsson, K [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Inst Working Life, Program Resp Hlth & Climate, S-11279 Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
D O I
10.1053/rmed.1999.0681
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 [临床医学]; 100201 [内科学];
摘要
The output of a nebulizer is generally defined as its weight loss during 1 min of nebulization. This mass output includes the weight loss due to evaporation of the solution required to moisten the dry air that is fed through the nebulizer. In order to compare results obtained from studies using different nebulizers we introduce the salt output as the amount of the solution that actually leaves the liquid phase as droplets and not by evaporation. The performance characteristics of a standard jet nebulizer (MA2) and a Sidestream jet neublizer were compared. Mass output was determined at different methacholine concentrations. Salt output was assessed by analysing the remaining salt in the nebulizers after 1 min of nebulization. Overall system performance in terms of forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV1) reduction after 1 min of exposure to individually selected concentrations of methacholine were studied in 15 healthy, non-smoking subjects. Both nebulizer types showed a moderate linear increase of mass output with methacholine concentration. The efficiency coefficient, the quotient between salt output and mass output, was found to be 0.93 and 0.75 for the MA2 and Sidestream nebulizer respectively. These findings were explained by differences in airflow through, and temperature inside, the nebulizers. The salt output of the nebulizers proved to be better correlated to the FEV1-reduction following methacholine inhalation than did the mass output. The relative amount of the salt output that adhered to the acrylic walls of the Sidestream nebulizer drying tower was found to be 9%. We conclude that it is more appropriate to use salt output than mass output as a nebulizer performance descriptor. The study also shows the importance of determining nebulizer system performance under conditions as similar to true provocations as possible. (C) 2000 HARCOURT PUBLISHERS LTD.
引用
收藏
页码:139 / 144
页数:6
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]
DISPOSABLE JET NEBULIZERS - HOW RELIABLE ARE THEY [J].
ALVINE, GF ;
RODGERS, P ;
FITZSIMMONS, KM ;
AHRENS, RC .
CHEST, 1992, 101 (02) :316-319
[2]
BERG E, 1995, J AEROSOL MED S3, V8, P3
[3]
TIME COURSE OF THE BRONCHOCONSTRICTION INDUCED BY INHALED HISTAMINE AND METHACHOLINE [J].
CARTIER, A ;
MALO, JL ;
BEGIN, P ;
SESTIER, M ;
MARTIN, RR .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY, 1983, 54 (03) :821-826
[4]
STANDARDIZATION OF BRONCHIAL INHALATION CHALLENGE PROCEDURES [J].
CHAI, H ;
FARR, RS ;
FROEHLICH, LA ;
MATHISON, DA ;
MCLEAN, JA ;
ROSENTHAL, RR ;
SHEFFER, AL ;
SPECTOR, SL ;
TOWNLEY, RG .
JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 1975, 56 (04) :323-327
[5]
STANDARDIZATION OF INHALATION PROVOCATION TESTS - DOSE VS CONCENTRATION OF HISTAMINE [J].
COCKCROFT, DW ;
BERSCHEID, BA .
CHEST, 1982, 82 (05) :572-575
[6]
IMPORTANCE OF EVAPORATIVE WATER LOSSES DURING STANDARDIZED NEBULIZED INHALATION PROVOCATION TESTS [J].
COCKCROFT, DW ;
HURST, TS ;
GORE, BP .
CHEST, 1989, 96 (03) :505-508
[7]
JET AND ULTRASONIC NEBULIZER OUTPUT - USE OF A NEW METHOD FOR DIRECT MEASUREMENT OF AEROSOL OUTPUT [J].
DENNIS, JH ;
STENTON, SC ;
BEACH, JR ;
AVERY, AJ ;
WALTERS, EH ;
HENDRICK, DJ .
THORAX, 1990, 45 (10) :728-732
[8]
INHALATION PROVOCATION TESTS [J].
HARGREAVE, FE ;
DOLOVICH, J ;
BOULET, LP .
SEMINARS IN RESPIRATORY MEDICINE, 1983, 4 (03) :224-236
[9]
KENDRICK A, 1985, RESP MED, V89, P157
[10]
KONGERUD J, 1989, EUR RESPIR J, V2, P681