On the allergenicity of Hev b 1 among health care workers and patients with spina bifida allergic to natural rubber latex

被引:73
作者
Chen, ZP [1 ]
Cremer, R [1 ]
Posch, A [1 ]
RaulfHeimsoth, M [1 ]
Rihs, HP [1 ]
Baur, X [1 ]
机构
[1] CHILDRENS HOSP,COLOGNE,GERMANY
关键词
latex allergy; Hev b 1; IgE; spina bifida; rubber elongation factor;
D O I
10.1016/S0091-6749(97)70174-X
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background: Recent studies have caused much controversy about the prevalence of IgE antibodies to Hev b 1 among health care workers (HCWs) and patients with spina bifida (SB) who are allergic to latex. This investigation was carried out to verify the results reported. Method: Serum samples from 140 patients with SB as well as from 105 HCWs allergic to latex were tested by enzyme allergosorbest test (EAST) and EAST-inhibition assay to evaluate the rate and degree of sensitization to highly purified Hev b 1. Results: Eighty-one percent of patients with SB who were allergic to latex had IgE antibodies against Hev b 1. The prevalence of anti-Hev b 1 antibodies among HCWs allergic to latex was 52.3%. In 15 of 33 serum samples from patients with SB that were randomly tested, the IgE binding to commercial latex allergens could be completely inhibited by Hev b 1; in only six cases was the maximum inhibition of IgE binding to latex by Hev b 1 less than 50%. Testing two monoclonal anti-Hev b 1 antibodies with extracts of five brands of latex gloves revealed a predominant presence of Hev b 1 protein as a monomer or its aggregates. Molecular analysis of human leukocyte antigen-D region genes DRB and DQB1 suggested no statistically significant correlation between the human leukocyte antigen alleles tested and IgE responsiveness to Hev b 1. Conclusions: Our results indicate that Hev b 1 not only makes significant contributions to the IgE binding to latex, but it is also the unique sensitizer in about 45% of patients with SB who are allergic to latex.
引用
收藏
页码:684 / 693
页数:10
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   SERUM REACTIVITIES TO LATEX PROTEINS (HEVEA-BRASILIENSIS) [J].
AKASAWA, A ;
HSIEH, LS ;
LIN, Y .
JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 1995, 95 (06) :1196-1205
[2]   Significance of rubber elongation factor as a latex allergen [J].
Alenius, H ;
Kalkkinen, N ;
Yip, E ;
Hasmin, H ;
Turjanmaa, K ;
MakinenKiljunen, S ;
Reunala, T ;
Palosuo, T .
INTERNATIONAL ARCHIVES OF ALLERGY AND IMMUNOLOGY, 1996, 109 (04) :362-368
[3]   Allergenic and anti-genic determinants of latex allergen Hev b 1: Peptide mapping of epitopes recognized by human, murine and rabbit antibodies [J].
Chen, Z ;
VanKampen, V ;
RaulfHeimsoth, M ;
Baur, X .
CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL ALLERGY, 1996, 26 (04) :406-415
[4]  
Chen Z, 1996, J ALLERGY CLIN IMMUN, V97, P982
[5]   Isolation and identification of hevein as a major IgE-binding polypeptide in Hevea latex [J].
Chen, ZP ;
Posch, A ;
Lohaus, C ;
RaulfHeimsoth, M ;
Meyer, HE ;
Baur, X .
JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 1997, 99 (03) :402-409
[6]   THE RUBBER ELONGATION-FACTOR OF RUBBER TREES (HEVEA-BRASILIENSIS) IS THE MAJOR ALLERGEN IN LATEX [J].
CZUPPON, AB ;
CHEN, Z ;
RENNERT, S ;
ENGELKE, T ;
MEYER, HE ;
HEBER, M ;
BAUR, X .
JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 1993, 92 (05) :690-697
[7]  
DENNIS MS, 1989, J BIOL CHEM, V264, P18608
[8]   The prevalence of anti-latex IgE antibodies among registered nurses [J].
Grzybowski, M ;
Ownby, DR ;
Peyser, PA ;
Johnson, CC ;
Schork, MA .
JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 1996, 98 (03) :535-544
[9]   LATEX-SPECIFIC PROTEINS CAUSING IMMEDIATE-TYPE CUTANEOUS, NASAL, BRONCHIAL, AND SYSTEMIC REACTIONS [J].
JAEGER, D ;
KLEINHANS, D ;
CZUPPON, AB ;
BAUR, X .
JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 1992, 89 (03) :759-768
[10]   A CLUSTER OF ANAPHYLACTIC REACTIONS IN CHILDREN WITH SPINA-BIFIDA DURING GENERAL-ANESTHESIA - EPIDEMIOLOGIC FEATURES, RISK-FACTORS, AND LATEX HYPERSENSITIVITY [J].
KELLY, KJ ;
PEARSON, ML ;
KURUP, VP ;
HAVENS, PL ;
BYRD, RS ;
SETLOCK, MA ;
BUTLER, JC ;
SLATER, JE ;
GRAMMER, LC ;
RESNICK, A ;
ROBERTS, M ;
JARVIS, WR ;
DAVIS, JP ;
FINK, JN .
JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 1994, 94 (01) :53-61