Knowledge Translation Strategies for Enhancing Nurses' Evidence-Informed Decision Making: A Scoping Review

被引:20
作者
Yost, Jennifer [1 ]
Thompson, David [2 ]
Ganann, Rebecca [1 ]
Aloweni, Fazila [3 ]
Newman, Kristine [4 ]
McKibbon, Ann [5 ]
Dobbins, Maureen [1 ]
Ciliska, Donna [1 ]
机构
[1] McMaster Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Sch Nursing, Hamilton, ON L8S 4K1, Canada
[2] Lakehead Univ, Sch Nursing, Fac Hlth & Behav Sci, Thunder Bay, ON P7B 5E1, Canada
[3] Singapore Gen Hosp, Singapore, Singapore
[4] Ryerson Univ, Fac Community Serv, Daphne Cockwell Sch Nursing, Toronto, ON, Canada
[5] McMaster Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Hamilton, ON L8S 4K1, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
nursing practice; professional issues; professional standards; advanced practice; advanced nursing practice; evidence-based practice; quality improvement; knowledge translation; IMPLEMENTING EVIDENCE; CARE;
D O I
10.1111/wvn.12043
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Background Nurses are increasingly expected to engage in evidence-informed decision making (EIDM); the use of research evidence with information about patient preferences, clinical context and resources, and their clinical expertise in decision making. Strategies for enhancing EIDM have been synthesized in high-quality systematic reviews, yet most relate to physicians or mixed disciplines. Existing reviews, specific to nursing, have not captured a broad range of strategies for promoting the knowledge and skills for EIDM, patient outcomes as a result of EIDM, or contextual information for why these strategies work. Aim To conduct a scoping review to identify and map the literature related to strategies implemented among nurses in tertiary care for promoting EIDM knowledge, skills, and behaviours, as well as patient outcomes and contextual implementation details. Methods A search strategy was developed and executed to identify relevant research evidence. Participants included registered nurses, clinical nurse specialists, nurse practitioners, and advanced practice nurses. Strategies were those enhancing nurses' EIDM knowledge, skills, or behaviours, as well as patient outcomes. Relevant studies included systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials, cluster randomized controlled trials, non-randomized trials (including controlled before and after studies), cluster non-randomized trials, interrupted time series designs, prospective cohort studies, mixed-method studies, and qualitative studies. Two reviewers performed study selection and data extraction using standardized forms. Disagreements were resolved through discussion or third party adjudication. Results Using a narrative synthesis, the body of research was mapped by design, clinical areas, strategies, and provider and patient outcomes to determine areas appropriate for a systematic review. Conclusions There are a sufficiently high number of studies to conduct a more focused systematic review by care settings, study design, implementation strategies, or outcomes. A focused review could assist in determining which strategies can be recommended for enhancing EIDM knowledge, skills, and behaviours among nurses in tertiary care.
引用
收藏
页码:156 / 167
页数:12
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
American Nurses Association, 2010, NURS SCOP STAND PRAC
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2013, POS STAT EV INF DEC
[3]  
[Anonymous], EV BAS NURS POS STAT
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2011, World health statistics 2011
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2008, COD STAND COND PERF
[6]  
[Anonymous], MOR KNOWL TRANSL CIH
[7]  
Arksey H., 2005, INT J SOC RES METHOD, V8, P19, DOI [DOI 10.1080/1364557032000119616, 10.1080/1364557032000119616]
[8]  
Bero LA, 1998, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V317, P465
[9]   Effective implementation of research into practice: An overview of systematic reviews of the health literature [J].
Boaz A. ;
Baeza J. ;
Fraser A. .
BMC Research Notes, 4 (1)
[10]   Implementation of an Evidence-based Feeding Protocol and Aspiration Risk Reduction Algorithm [J].
Bowman, Amy ;
Greiner, Joseph E. ;
Doerschug, Kevin C. ;
Little, Susan B. ;
Bombei, Cheryl L. ;
Comried, Lynn M. .
CRITICAL CARE NURSING QUARTERLY, 2005, 28 (04) :324-333