Why Are Total Knee Arthroplasties Failing Today-Has Anything Changed After 10 Years?

被引：680

作者：

Sharkey, Peter F. ^{[1
]}

Lichstein, Paul M. ^{[1
]}

Shen, Chao ^{[1
]}

Tokarski, Anthony T. ^{[1
]}

Parvizi, Javad ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Rothman Inst, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA

来源：

JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY | 2014年 / 29卷 / 09期

关键词：

knee arthroplasty; failure; revision; STIFFNESS; REPLACEMENT; REVISION; OUTCOMES; SURVIVAL; HIP;

D O I：

10.1016/j.arth.2013.07.024

中图分类号：

R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学（修复外科学）];

学科分类号：

100224 [整形外科学];

摘要：

The purpose of this study was to determine the frequency and cause of failure after total knee arthroplasty and compare the results with those reported by our similar investigation conducted 10 years ago. A total of 781 revision TKAs performed at our institution over the past 10 years were identified. The most common failure mechanisms were: loosening (39.9%), infection (27.4%), instability (7.5%), periprosthetic fracture (4.7%), and arthrofibrosis (4.5%). Infection was the most common failure mechanism for early revision (<2 years from primary) and aseptic loosening was the most common reason for late revision. Polyethylene (PE) wear was no longer the major cause of failure. Compared to our previous report, the percentage of revisions performed for polyethylene wear, instability, arthrofibrosis, malalignment and extensor mechanism deficiency has decreased. (C) 2014 Published by Elsevier Inc.

引用

页码：1774 / 1778

页数：5

共 25 条

[1]

Increased Long-Term Survival of Posterior Cruciate-Retaining Versus Posterior Cruciate-Stabilizing Total Knee Replacements [J].