Competition for nutrients and optimal root allocation

被引:137
作者
Craine, Joseph M.
机构
[1] Dartmouth Coll, Hanover, NH 03755 USA
[2] Univ Minnesota, St Paul, MN 55108 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会; 美国安德鲁·梅隆基金会;
关键词
allocation; co-limitation; competition; nitrogen; roots; SERMUN;
D O I
10.1007/s11104-006-9002-x
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
The allocation of resources among roots and shoots represents the largest flux of resources within a plant and therefore should have been selected to maximize benefits to plants. Yet, it is unclear why some species like temperate grasses have such high root length density (RLD). Either the slow rate of diffusion of inorganic N in soils or interplant competition could explain the high RLD of temperate grasses. Using a fine-scale model of nutrient dynamics in the soil and plant growth, a cost-benefit approach was used to assess optimal allocation rates for plants that accounted for value of both carbon and nitrogen. In the absence of interplant competition, resource benefits are maximized with very little root length except in extremely dry soils for ammonium. In the presence of a competitor, optimal allocation of N to roots is much greater and increases as ability of competitors to produce root length increase. Competition for inorganic nitrogen generates a classic aspect of the tragedy of the commons, the "race for fish", where plants must allocate more resources to acquisition of the limiting resource than is optimal for plants in the absence of competition. As such, nutrient competition needs to be directly addressed when understanding plant- and ecosystem-level resource fluxes as well as the evolution of root systems.
引用
收藏
页码:171 / 185
页数:15
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
Aerts R, 2000, ADV ECOL RES, V30, P1, DOI 10.1016/S0065-2504(08)60016-1
[2]  
ANDREWS R, 1979, OECOLOG PLANTAR, V5, P319
[3]   Limitations on photosynthesis of competing individuals in stands and the consequences for canopy structure [J].
Anten, NPR ;
Hirose, T .
OECOLOGIA, 2001, 129 (02) :186-196
[4]   The causes of inherently slow growth in alpine plants: An analysis based on the underlying carbon economies of alpine and lowland Poa species [J].
Atkin, OK ;
Botman, B ;
Lambers, H .
FUNCTIONAL ECOLOGY, 1996, 10 (06) :698-707
[5]   RESOURCE LIMITATION IN PLANTS - AN ECONOMIC ANALOGY [J].
BLOOM, AJ ;
CHAPIN, FS ;
MOONEY, HA .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ECOLOGY AND SYSTEMATICS, 1985, 16 :363-392
[6]   Estimating age-dependent costs and benefits of roots with contrasting life span: comparing apples and oranges [J].
Bouma, TJ ;
Yanai, RD ;
Elkin, AD ;
Hartmond, U ;
Flores-Alva, DE ;
Eissenstat, DM .
NEW PHYTOLOGIST, 2001, 150 (03) :685-695
[7]   Modelling the components of plant respiration: Some guiding principles [J].
Cannell, MGR ;
Thornley, JHM .
ANNALS OF BOTANY, 2000, 85 (01) :45-54
[8]  
Chapin IIIF. S., 1991, RESPONSE PLANTS MULT, P67, DOI [DOI 10.1016/B978-0-08-092483-0.50008-6, 10.1016/B978-0-08-092483-0.50008-6]
[9]   The resource economics of chemical and structural defenses across nitrogen supply gradients [J].
Craine, J ;
Bond, W ;
Lee, WG ;
Reich, PB ;
Ollinger, S .
OECOLOGIA, 2003, 137 (04) :547-556
[10]   Supply pre-emption, not concentration reduction, is the mechanism of competition for nutrients [J].
Craine, JM ;
Fargione, J ;
Sugita, S .
NEW PHYTOLOGIST, 2005, 166 (03) :933-940