The state of US trauma systems: public perceptions versus reality - Implications for US response to terrorism and mass casualty events

被引:23
作者
Champion, Howard R.
Mabee, Marcia S.
Meredith, J. Wayne
机构
[1] Coalit Amer Trauma Care, Reston, VA USA
[2] Amer Coll Surg, Comm Trauma, Chicago, IL USA
[3] Wake Forest Univ, Bowman Gray Sch Med, Dept Surg, Winston Salem, NC 27103 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.08.019
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: Injury has long been identified as the number one killer of Americans under the age of 34, and establishment of regional trauma systems and centers incorporating primary, secondary, and tertiary care and injury-prevention strategies has proved to be a vital element in reducing injury-related sequelae, deaths, and even costs. Despite these facts, trauma system development has not been given priority for funding in many local and state governments and only intermittently at the federal level. Consequently, many of the nation's trauma centers are strapped for funds to provide emergency care to their patients. STUDY DESIGN: In response to a 2002 Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) report,(1) which identified public support as a key element in the success of trauma system development in states and communities across the United States, a Harris Interactive study was undertaken in the fall of 2004 to determine the public's attitudes, awareness, and knowledge concerning the nature and availability of trauma care and systems of trauma care. Results of the poll were contrasted with current data on the state of US trauma systems to determine the degree of correspondence. RESULTS: Results of the poll indicated that fully 61% of the American public does not know that injury is the leading cause of death for those aged 1 to 34, and most believe that a trauma system is in place in every state. Almost two-thirds of the American public is confident of receiving the best medical care in the event of serious injury and would be seriously concerned if no trauma center were nearby. But only eight states have fully developed trauma systems, and most states have no federal funding or infrastructure in place for managing the aftermath of a natural disaster or terrorist event. These and other objective data reveal the mismatch between public perceptions and reality. CONCLUSIONS: Although almost 90% of Americans believe that state trauma systems and hospitals should have a coordinated trauma response, this has not been made a national priority. Trauma systems must be adequately developed and supported to fulfill the public's expectation to receive the best possible care if seriously injured, and to ensure readiness for mass casualty and terrorist incidents.
引用
收藏
页码:951 / 961
页数:11
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]
EPIDEMIOLOGY OF TRAUMA DEATHS [J].
BAKER, CC ;
OPPENHEIMER, L ;
STEPHENS, B ;
LEWIS, FR ;
TRUNKEY, DD .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1980, 140 (01) :144-150
[2]
Update on trauma system development in the United States [J].
Bass, RR ;
Gainer, PS ;
Carlini, AR .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 1999, 47 (03) :S15-S21
[3]
Access to trauma centers in the United States [J].
Branas, CC ;
MacKenzie, EJ ;
Williams, JC ;
Schwab, CW ;
Teter, HM ;
Flanigan, MC ;
Blatt, AJ ;
ReVelle, CS .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2005, 293 (21) :2626-2633
[4]
A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing outcome of severely injured patients treated in trauma centers following the establishment of trauma systems [J].
Celso, B ;
Tepas, J ;
Langland-Orban, B ;
Pracht, E ;
Papa, L ;
Lottenberg, L ;
Flint, L .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 2006, 60 (02) :371-378
[5]
CHAMPION HR, 1994, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V129, P681
[6]
CHAMPION HR, 1992, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V127, P333
[7]
ABDOMINAL INJURIES IN AUTOMOBILE ACCIDENTS - REVIEW OF CARE OF FATALLY INJURED PATIENTS [J].
FOLEY, RW ;
HARRIS, LS ;
PILCHER, DB .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 1977, 17 (08) :611-615
[8]
Houtchens B A, 1977, JACEP, V6, P343, DOI 10.1016/S0361-1124(77)80167-6
[9]
Institute of Medicine
[10]
Committee on the Future of Emergency Care in the United States Health System, 2006, HOSP BAS EM CAR BREA