Improved Perioperative Outcomes With Minimally Invasive Distal Pancreatectomy Results From a Population-Based Analysis

被引:63
作者
Cao, Hop S. Tran [1 ,2 ]
Lopez, Nicole [2 ]
Chang, David C. [2 ]
Lowy, Andrew M. [2 ]
Bouvet, Michael [2 ]
Baumgartner, Joel M. [2 ]
Talamini, Mark A. [2 ]
Sicklick, Jason K. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Surg Oncol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Diego, UC San Diego Hlth Syst, Dept Surg, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
关键词
CLINICAL-OUTCOMES; RESECTION; METAANALYSIS; MORBIDITY; SAFE;
D O I
10.1001/jamasurg.2013.3202
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
IMPORTANCE Interest in minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (MIDP) has grown in recent years, but currently available data are limited. Greater insight into application patterns and outcomes may be gained from a national database inquiry. OBJECTIVES To study trends in the use of MIDP and compare the short-term outcomes of MIDP with those of open distal pancreatectomy. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Population-based retrospective cohort study evaluating perioperative outcomes and hospital charge measures for distal pancreatectomy, comparing the surgical approaches and adjusting for patient-and hospital-level factors, among patients undergoing elective distal pancreatectomy from 1998 to 2009 in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample in a 20% stratified sample of all US hospitals. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES In-hospital mortality, rates of perioperative complications and splenectomy, total charges, and length of stay. RESULTS A total of 8957 distal pancreatectomies were included in this analysis, of which 382 (4.3%) were MIDPs. On a national level, this projected to 42 320 open distal pancreatectomies and 1908 MIDPs. The proportion of distal pancreatectomies performed via minimally invasive approaches tripled between 1998 and 2009, from 2.4% to 7.3%. The groups were comparable for sex and comorbidity profiles, while patients who underwent MIDP were 1.5 years older. On multivariate analysis, MIDP was associated with lower rates of overall predischarge complications, including lower incidences of postoperative infections and bleeding complications, as well as a shorter length of stay by 1.22 days. There were no differences in rates of in-hospital mortality, concomitant splenectomy, or total charges. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE This population-based study of MIDP reveals that the application of this approach has tripled in practice and provides strong evidence that MIDP has evolved into a safe option in the treatment of benign and malignant pancreatic diseases.
引用
收藏
页码:237 / 243
页数:7
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy: a clinical and cost-effectiveness study
    Abu Hilal, Mohammad
    Hamdan, Mohammed
    Di Fabio, Francesco
    Pearce, Neil W.
    Johnson, Colin D.
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2012, 26 (06): : 1670 - 1674
  • [2] Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality: Overview of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS), OV NAT INP SAMPL NIS
  • [3] A Prospective single institution comparison of peri-operative outcomes for laparoscopic and open distal pancreatectomy
    Baker, Marshall S.
    Bentrem, David J.
    Ujiki, Michael B.
    Stocker, Susan
    Talamonti, Mark S.
    [J]. SURGERY, 2009, 146 (04) : 635 - 645
  • [4] Surgical Innovation and Evaluation 1 Evaluation and stages of surgical innovations
    Barkun, Jeffrey S.
    Aronson, Jeffrey K.
    Feldman, Liane S.
    Maddern, Guy J.
    Strasberg, Steven M.
    [J]. LANCET, 2009, 374 (9695) : 1089 - 1096
  • [5] A NEW METHOD OF CLASSIFYING PROGNOSTIC CO-MORBIDITY IN LONGITUDINAL-STUDIES - DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION
    CHARLSON, ME
    POMPEI, P
    ALES, KL
    MACKENZIE, CR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHRONIC DISEASES, 1987, 40 (05): : 373 - 383
  • [6] Cuschieri A, 1994, J R Coll Surg Edinb, V39, P178
  • [7] Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Distal Pancreatectomy Is Superior to the Laparoscopic Technique
    Daouadi, Mustapha
    Zureikat, Amer H.
    Zenati, Mazen S.
    Choudry, Haroon
    Tsung, Alan
    Bartlett, David L.
    Hughes, Steven J.
    Lee, Ken K.
    Moser, A. James
    Zeh, Herbert J.
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2013, 257 (01) : 128 - 132
  • [8] Comparison of outcomes and costs between laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy and open resection at a single center
    Fox, Adrian M.
    Pitzul, Kristen
    Bhojani, Faizal
    Kaplan, Max
    Moulton, Carol-Anne
    Wei, Alice C.
    McGilvray, Ian
    Cleary, Sean
    Okrainec, Allan
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2012, 26 (05): : 1220 - 1230
  • [9] LAPAROSCOPIC PYLORUS-PRESERVING PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY
    GAGNER, M
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY-ULTRASOUND AND INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 1994, 8 (05): : 408 - 410
  • [10] Laparoscopic total gastrectomy versus open total gastrectomy for cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Haverkamp, Leonie
    Weijs, Teus J.
    van der Sluis, Pieter C.
    van der Tweel, Ingeborg
    Ruurda, Jelle P.
    van Hillegersberg, Richard
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2013, 27 (05): : 1509 - 1520