How applicants want and expect to be treated: Applicants' selection treatment beliefs and the development of the social process questionnaire on selection

被引:32
作者
Derous, E
Born, MP
De Witte, K
机构
[1] Erasmus Univ, Inst Psychol, NL-3000 DR Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Louvain, Belgium
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.0965-075X.2004.00267.x
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
In psychology, general beliefs are considered to be the stepping-stones of future behavior and attitudes (Rokeach, 1973; Olson, Roese, & Zanna, 1996). The goal of this paper is to explore applicants' general beliefs about the selection treatment, namely the way they want and expect to be treated during selection. After the concept of selection treatment beliefs is introduced and both its theoretical and practical relevance is highlighted, the development of the Social Process Questionnaire on Selection (SPQS) is reported, which measures selection treatment beliefs. Factor analyses (660 students and 643 applicants) revealed six treatment factors. Applicants valued and expected transparency, objectivity, feedback, Job information, participation, and a humane treatment. Apparently, applicants valued the six factors more than they expected them to be realized. The scientific and practical relevance of the findings are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:99 / 119
页数:21
相关论文
共 104 条
[1]  
ALDARMAKI F, 1993, J COUNS PSYCHOL, V40, P379
[2]  
American Educational Research Association American Psychological Association and National Council on Measurement in Education, 1999, STAND ED PSYCH TEST
[3]   Applicant and recruiter reactions to new technology in selection: A critical review and agenda for future research [J].
Anderson, N .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SELECTION AND ASSESSMENT, 2003, 11 (2-3) :121-136
[4]   Towards a theory of socialization impact: Selection as pre-entry socialization [J].
Anderson, N .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SELECTION AND ASSESSMENT, 2001, 9 (1-2) :84-91
[5]  
Anderson NR, 1998, J ORGAN BEHAV, V19, P235, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199805)19:3<235::AID-JOB837>3.3.CO
[6]  
2-3
[7]  
ANDRIESSEN M, 2001, KWALITEIT ARBEIDSBEM
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2002, INT REV IND ORG PSYC
[9]  
[Anonymous], HDB IND WORK ORG PSY
[10]  
Arbuckle J. L, 1999, AMOS 4 0 COMPUTER SO